If you need a forcible entry and detainer Attorney in Ohio, call at 888-354-4529.

Mary Morris appeals from the trial court’s order awarding
her attorney fees following the settlement of Morris’s action
against Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) under the
Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (the Song-Beverly Act).
(Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.) Morris sued Hyundai after she
purchased a defective used Hyundai vehicle that Hyundai
refused to repurchase. The partie

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Appellants purchased a San Francisco
property in 2000 (Property). They initially lived at the Property and obtained a
homeowners insurance policy from State Farm. Appellants moved out and began renting
the Property in 2003. They contacted their State Farm agent to inquire about appropriate
insurance coverage for the Property. At their dir

¶0 1. EVIDENCE - Parol Evidence to Prove Fraud Inducing Execution of Contract.
An exception to the parol evidence rule exists for the purpose of proving fraud in inducing execution of a written contract.
2. FRAUD - Rescission or Recovery of Damages as Remedy of Party Induced by Fraud to Execute Contract.
A contract may be rescinded, or damages recovered for the effect of the contract,

¶1 The appellant explosive company instituted this action below on January 28, 1926, against Ella Wilcox, to cancel a warranty deed from H. H. Wilcox to defendant below, which deed on its face appears to have been executed and delivered January 3, 1922, and duly recorded November 4, 1925, and "in consideration of the sum of $ 1 and other valuable considerations," and in conveyance of the N.E. 1/4

¶1 The appellees, Charles P. and Pricilla M. Donnelly, husband and wife, (Donnellys) contracted with Jim Walter Homes, Inc. (builder) for the construction of a shell house on their real property. Principal part of the contract price was paid by the Donnellys executing a non-negotiable note, secured by a real estate mortgage, to the builder. The builder assigned the note and mortgage to Mid-State H

¶1 This is an appeal by the plaintiff in the trial court, from an order sustaining defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's evidence, and rendering judgment for defendant on its cross-petition.

¶2 The petition in its original form sought damages caused by an alleged breach of defendant's oral warranty as to fitness and condition of a certain laundry machine purchased by plaintiff from defendan

¶0 1. Contracts--Fraud--Remedies.
A party who, by fraud, has been induced to enter into a contract has, upon discovery thereof, a choice of two classes of remedy, to wit, rescission or affirmance.
2. Same--Rescission--Restoration of Consideration.
A party attempting to rescind a contract must comply with the statutes by offering to restore, or by restoring, everything which is of value

To settle Mary Hanna’s lawsuit under the Song-Beverly
Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.), MercedesBenz
USA, LLC agreed on January 27, 2017 to pay Hanna
$60,000 plus a sum equal to her costs and expenses in pursuing
the action, “including attorney’s fees based on actual time
reasonably incurred . . . pursuant to Civil Code Section 1794(d),
to be determined by

This case concerns a massive, months-long leak from a
natural gas storage facility located just outside Los Angeles.
According to the allegations before us, the accident severely
harmed the economy of a nearby suburb. We must decide if local
businesses — none of which allege they suffered personal injury
or property damage — may recover in negligence for income lost
because

¶1 While the appeal before us presents complex procedural questions of both state and federal character and some first-impression matters of adjective law, the case's legal issues are posed in the context of two rather straightforward queries - (1) Was Gulf Oil Corporation, now Chevron USA Inc., and GOC Acquisition Corporation [collectively Gulf] justified in terminating the merger agreement betwe