Hetronic Internations, Inc. v. Kimberly Curtis |
Oklahoma City, OK - Hetronic Internations, Inc. sued Kimberly Curtis on a breach of contract theory claiming: |
State of Oklahoma v. Isaac Luna Ashton |
Tulsa, OK - Man Convicted On Double Murder Charges |
Dwayne Pitts v. Amazon.com and Best Choice Products |
Oklahoma City, OK - Dwayne Pitts sued Amazon.com and Best Choice Products on products liability theoriesclaiming: |
Spurlino Materials of Indianapolis, LLC v. NLRB |
The petitioner’s employees conducted a strike that they said was intended to protest the company’s unlawful termination of and failure to reinstate a prominent union supporter. At the same time, they honored a clause in an agreement they had with the company not to strike -- for any reason -- on one particular construction project. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found that the strike $0 (12-10-2015 - NY) |
SUFI NETWORK SERVICES, INC. v. USA |
This case is before the Court on remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. SUFI Network Servs., Inc. v. United States, 785 F.3d 585 (Fed. Cir. 2015). In the decision reviewed on appeal, this Court had awarded attorneys’ fees to SUFI with interest, but had denied SUFI’s request for overhead and profit on attorneys’ fees. SUFI Network Servs., Inc. v. United States, 113 Fed. C $0 (12-09-2015 - DC) |
State of Minnesota vs. Jerry Expose, Jr. |
This case requires us to determine whether the therapist-client privilege, which |
State of Oklahoma v. Victor Cornell Miller |
Tulsa, OK - Man sentenced to life without parole for murder committed in 1999 |
Blume Construction, Inc. v. State of North Dakota |
Blume received a notice of determination from Job Service dated November 8, 2013, informing Blume that it would be assigned a penalty tax rate for unemployment insurance. The notice stated the agency conducted an audit and concluded there was a transfer of ownership and payroll between Blume and another company that was knowingly done to obtain a lower tax rate for unemployment insurance. The noti $0 (12-08-2015 - ND) |
Humana Medical Plan, Inc. vs. Mary Reale, et al. |
Humana, the appellant in this case, administers Medicare benefits to enrollees |
Glanden v. Quirk |
Husband and Wife were married for twenty-two years. They separated in |
Gregory Berry v. LexisNexis Risk and Information |
The class action settlement at issue in this appeal is “the culmination of years of litigation and negotiations” between class counsel and the defendants, LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc.; Seisint, Inc.; and Reed Elsevier Inc. (together, “Lexis”). Berry v. LexisNexis Risk & Info. Analytics Grp., Inc., No. 3:11-CV-754, 2014 WL 4403524, at *1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 5, 2014). The dis $0 (12-07-2015 - VA) |
BREWINGTON, et al v. VENEMAN, et al |
Ms. Sanders is a former partner in the law firm Chestnut, Sanders, Sanders & |
State of Louisiana v. Ronald C. Dale |
The charges against Dale, age 46, followed a police investigation that |
United States v. Freeman |
On September 25, 2014, a federal grand jury returned a two-count indictment charging Defendant Ralph Freeman ("Defendant") with one count of receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) ("Count One") and one count of possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4) ("Count Two"). [Dkt. 16.] On November 20, 2014 [Dkt. 49], and again on the first day of t $0 (12-06-2015 - VA) |
Lawing v. Univar |
This case revolves around the packaging and labeling of sodium bromate, a chemical which contributed to a fire that occurred in a plant owned by Engelhard Corporation (Engelhard) in Seneca, South Carolina, in June 2004. At the time of the fire, Scott Lawing worked at Engelhard's Seneca plant as a maintenance mechanic.1 Engelhard produced a precious metal catalyst used in the automobile industry, $0 (12-05-2015 - SC) |
Bruce McCoy, Jr. v. W. A. Kendall & Co., Inc. |
On March 1, 2013, McCoy began employment with Kendall as a |
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY v. JAMES E. PHILLIPS |
James Phillips sued his employer, BNSF Railway Company, under the Federal Employers’ |
SYLVIA GALVAN v. MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEM |
In enacting the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Congress struck a delicate balance to |
KINGSAIRE, INC. D/B/A KINGS AIRE, INC. v. JORGE MELENDEZ |
Petitioner Kingsaire, Inc., doing business as Kings Aire, Inc. (Kings Aire), is a family-owned |
IN RE RSR CORPORATION AND QUEMETCO METALS LIMITED, INC., RELATORS |
This original proceeding concerns whether the trial court abused its discretion by |
Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech. |
Roskop Dairy, L.L.C. (Roskop Dairy), owned by Michael Roskop (Roskop), is a commercial dairy operation. GEA Farm Technologies, Inc. (GEA), manufactures automated dairy equipment used in dairy systems. Midwest Livestock Systems, Inc. (Midwest), was an authorized dealer of GEA products. Roskop Dairy sued the defendants for damages allegedly stemming from the “Dematron 60 Air Detacher Package” (Demat $0 (12-04-2015 - NE) |
Canonsburg General Hospital v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell |
Through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Secretary provides for the reimbursement of the reasonable costs of healthcare services for Medicare beneficiaries. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(b)(1)(A). Two aspects of the reimbursement scheme are relevant here. The first is the system for managing the costs of reimbursement. Healthcare providers submit requests for reimbursement for $0 (12-04-2015 - DC) |
United States of America v. Don Blankenship |
Charleston, WV - Federal Jury Returns Guilty Verdict in Blankenship Trial |
State of Tennessee v. Tavarus Detterio Griffin |
Tavarski Beauregard testified that on October 7, 2007, he participated in a home invasion at the house of Mike and Janet Hill and was accompanied by two acquaintances, Chris Tosh and the Defendant. According to Mr. Beauregard, he drove the Defendant and Mr. Tosh to the Hills‘ home in Mr. Tosh‘s girlfriend‘s car. Mr. Beauregard parked the car in a church parking lot that was adjacent to the Hills $0 (12-03-2015 - TN) |
Bluestem Telephone Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n |
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996 Act) was passed by Congress in order to further deregulate the telecommunications industry. 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq. (2012); see Citizens' Utility Ratepayer Bd. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n, 264 Kan. 363, 369, 956 P.2d 685 (1998). The 1996 Act was intended to serve the dual purposes of ensuring "universal service" to both low income consumers and consumers i $0 (12-03-2015 - KS) |
Next Page |