San Francisco, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

On August 18, 2002, Marc Holland ("Holland") rented a 2002 Ford Escort from ERAC-SF. ( See Duley Decl., filed October 22, 2004, Ex. 5; Watt Decl., filed November 5, 2004, Ex. B.) At the time Holland rented the subject vehicle, his driver's license was suspended

San Diego, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Comparative Negligence in California Under this law, the amount of compensation an injured party can receive is determined by their level of fault in relation to the accident. For example, if a court determines that the injured party is 20% at fault, their total damages award will

Omaha, Nebraska personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

In Nebraska, the right to compensation is based on the “51% rule.” A plaintiff can still recover partial compensation so long as their degree of fault is less than that of the defendant(s) in the case. The plaintiff's compensation will be reduced in proportion to their percentage o

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Minnesota follows the “comparative negligence” rule. Under this system, a plaintiff's compensation can be reduced by a percentage that equals their share of fault in causing the accident. If a plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault, they are barred from recovering d

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Minnesota follows the “comparative negligence” rule. Under this system, a plaintiff's compensation can be reduced by a percentage that equals their share of fault in causing the accident. If a plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault, they are barred fro

Minneapolis, Minnesota insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

604.18 INSURANCE STANDARD OF CONDUCT.
Subdivision 1.Terms.

For purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them.

(a) "Insurance policy" means a written agreement between an insured and an insurer t

Minneapolis, Minnesota insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

604.18 INSURANCE STANDARD OF CONDUCT.
Subdivision 1.Terms.

For purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them.

(a) "Insurance policy" means a written agreement between an insured and an insurer that obligates

Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, 2316-CV23414, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Missouri follows a comparative negligence principle which means even if you're partially at fault for an accident, you can still receive

St. Louis, Missouri personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 23SL-CC02908, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Missouri follows a comparative negligence principle which means even if you're partially at fault for an accident, you can still re

Hot Springs, Arkansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Arkansas is a modified comparative fault state. This means that if a victim is found to be 50% at fault for their injuries, they will be barred from recovering compensation of any kind. Multiple parties can have acted negligently, contributing to a victim's injuries, incl

South Bend, Indiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover damages as long as you are not more than 50 percent responsible for the accident. However, your percentage of fault will reduce the amount of c

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Marion Superior Court 2, 49D02-2110-CT-036154, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover dam

Indianapolis, Indiana insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff which sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Personnel Staffing Group, LLC, alleges that Protective Insurance Company breached workers' compensation insurance policies that it issued to Personnel, and acted in bad faith by mishandling Personnel's employees' claims. Protective asserts several countercl

Louisville, Kentucky personal injury lawyer presented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filing in the Jefferson Circuit Court, 22-CI-004113, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

If you are a visitor to a person's home or apartment, property, or business, and are injured as a result of a dangerous condition or hazard, you

Paducah, Kentucky personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Graves Circuit Court, 20-CI-00174, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

If you are a visitor to a person's home or apartment, property, or business, and are injured as a result of a dangerous condition or haz

Paducah, Kentucky insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

This case was filed in the Christian Circuit Court, 22-CI-00820, and was removed to federal court.

"Insurers are required to honor the terms of the insurance policy and handle claims fairly and timely. However, many insurance companies will use tactics designed to d

Covington, Kentucky personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Kentucky is a pure comparative negligence state. If both you and the other party in an accident are partially responsible for causing the accident, the fault will be distributed between you both in percentages.

01/10/2024 111 Proposed Agreed Order extending dea

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Fraud Charges.

Sudbury Bookkeeper Sentenced to Two Years in Prison for Fraud Charges

Detroit, Michigan personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Washtenaw County Circuit Court, 23-001633-NI, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The Plaintiff sought remand to the state court because the federal court lacked jurisdiction.

Michigan’s comparative negligence

Tacoma, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraud on COVID relief programs.

Canadian resident sentenced to 3+ years in prison for more than $1 million fraud on COVID relief programs

Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Evading $3.7 Million in Income Taxes.

Suburban Chicago Businessman Sentenced to Two Years in Prison for Evading $3.7 Million in Income Taxes

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

North Carolina's strict rules on determining fault in car accidents are known as “pure contributory negligence” laws. This means that the victim has to be 100 percent free of fault for the accident in order to receive compensation. Unfortunately, this task can

Raleigh, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Robeson County Superior Court, 23-CVS-286, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

North Carolina's strict rules on determining fault in car accidents are known as “pure contributory negligence” laws.

Washington, DC personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, 2022 CA 000031 V, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Unlike most states, Washington D.C. is a contributory negligence state. Under contributory negligence rules, victims cannot

Lewisburg, West Virginia family law divorce lawyers represented the parties.



Petitioner Jason H.[1] ("Father") appeals the April 19, 2023, final order of the Family Court of Greenbrier County, which granted Respondent Mozella F.'s ("Mother") petition for modification of child support, modifying child support to $512.81 per month. Father asserts that the family court's calculatio