United States of America v. Patrick J. Quinn |
Boston, Massachusetts criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with fraudulently receiving disability benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Social Security Administration (SSA). |
United States of America v. Ricky Gonzales |
Tampa, Florida criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud the United States. |
Levinson Smith & Huffman, P.C., et al. v. Trevor Henson, et al. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on fraud, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, constructive trust, alter ego liability, unjust enrichment, equitable accounting, and conversion of personal property theories. |
United States of America v. Tony Ren |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with bribery. |
United States of America v. Industrial Equipment and Supply Company, LLC (IESC), Mark Nystoriak and Sandra Nystoriak |
Albany, New York civil litigation lawyers represented Defendants accused of violating the False Claims Act. |
United States of America v. Mohammad Fares |
Buffalo, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with theft of government property, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $,250,000 fine. |
United States of America v. Adedayo Ilori |
New York, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with engaging in a fraudulent scheme to obtain more than $10 million in government-guaranteed loans designed to provide relief to small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
United States of America v. Quincy T. Doss |
Birmingham, Alabama criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with defrauding the Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). |
United States of America v. Christopher Toups |
San Diego, California criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. |
United States of America v. Honeywell International, Inc. |
Washington, DC: civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of violating the False Claims Act by selling defective material for bullet proof vests used by law enforcement officers. |
Derrick Palmer, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc. |
Brooklyn, New York employment law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on Wage and Act Violation and other theories. |
Anthony J. Hampton v. Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union of America, Local 218, AFL-CIO |
Kansas City, Kansas civil rights lawyer represent Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory because of his race. |
United States of America v. Jerry May Keepers |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with for writing and referring compounded drug prescriptions in return for illegal kickback payments. |
United States of America v. Sutter Health |
San Francisco, California civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant charged with violating the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, which provides: |
United States of America v. Roshanak Khadem, a.k.a. “Roxanne Khadem,” a.k.a. “Roxy Khadem” |
Los Angeles, California criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiring to defraud health insurance companies by causing millions of dollars in fraudulent claims to be submitted to provide patients with “free” cosmetic procedures, including Botox injections, and for cheating on her taxes. |
Jennifer Anderson v. Verified First, LLC |
Boise, Idaho employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued on a 42 U.S.C. 2000 job discrimination based on sex theory. |
United States ex rel. GNGH 2, Inc. v. Birdsall Voss & Associates, Inc. |
Milwaukee, Wisconsin civil litigation lawyer represented Defendant accused of violation the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, which provides: |
United States of America v. George Thacker |
Chattanooga, Tennessee criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343., which provides: |
United States of America v. Jo Ann Macrina |
Atlanta, Georgia criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with accepting bribes from an Atlanta contractor in exchange for steering city business worth millions of dollars to the contractor's company in violation of 18 .S.C. 666, which provides: |
United States of America v. Vania May Bell |
New York City, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with attempt and conspiracy to commit mail fraud. |
United States of America v. Professional Maintenance Management (PPM) |
Baltimore, Maryland civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of discriminated against non-U.S. citizen worked when checking their permissin to work in the United States in violation of Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). |
James Johnson v. Transforce, Inc. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Americans With Disabilities Act job discrimination in employment theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e, which provides: |
Meghan Grove v. State Farm Insurance Company |
Mobile, Alabama insurance lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory. |
Nicole Olcott, ex rel. United States of America v. Southwester Home Health Care, Inc., et al. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff and Relator who sued Defendant on a qui tam theory claiming that Defendant violation the false claims act, 31 U.S.C. 3730, which provides: |
United States of America v. Travis Ford |
Lincoln, Nebraska criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with threatening a public official. |
Next Page |