In this appeal, appellants Mark and Bella Greene challenge
the California Coastal Commission’s permit condition for the
remodel of their beachside residence. The condition requires
construction be set back five feet from the seaward property line.
The Greenes argue the Commission erred in finding that a fivefoot
buffer was needed to safeguard the public’s access to the
beac

Elvia Velasco Jimenez asserted claims under the Fair Employment and Housing
Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.)1 against her contracting employer2 U.S.
Continental Marketing Inc. (USCM), a manufacturing company that negotiated with
Jimenez's direct employer Ameritemps, Inc. (Ameritemps), a temporary-staffing agency,
for her employment.3 Jimenez's claims required a threshold sho

If you need a custody dispute Attorney in Ohio, call at 888-354-4529.

If you need a Workmans Comp Attorney in Ohio, call at 888-354-4529.

The Government Code requires a contract between an employee and a school
district to provide that, if the contract is terminated, the maximum cash settlement the
employee may receive is an amount equal to the monthly salary of the employee
multiplied by the number of months left on the unexpired term of the contract, up to a
maximum of 18 months. (Gov. Code, §§ 53260, subd. (a); 5

Mary Morris appeals from the trial court’s order awarding
her attorney fees following the settlement of Morris’s action
against Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) under the
Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (the Song-Beverly Act).
(Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.) Morris sued Hyundai after she
purchased a defective used Hyundai vehicle that Hyundai
refused to repurchase. The partie

If you need a Estate Attorney in Ohio, call at 888-354-4529.

Does “regular rate of compensation” for calculating meal
or rest break premium payments mean the same thing as
“regular rate of pay” for calculating overtime premium payments,
and does facially neutral “rounding” of employee work time
systematically undercompensate Jessica Ferra and a class of
employees of Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC (Loews)? We agree
with the trial court th

Two employers agreed that the general employer would
obtain workers’ compensation insurance for employees it leased
to the special employer.1
Relying on this agreement, the special
employer obtained workers’ compensation insurance for its own
employees with a “limiting endorsement” excluding coverage for
special employees. These agreements were in place for several
year