In September 2016, appellant began dating Evonne White. Eventually, he
began spending most nights of the week at White’s apartment. One morning, while
appellant was still asleep, White looked through appellant’s cell phone and
discovered text messages showing that he had been unfaithful to her with other
women.
3

White woke appellant and confronted him wi

To settle Mary Hanna’s lawsuit under the Song-Beverly
Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.), MercedesBenz
USA, LLC agreed on January 27, 2017 to pay Hanna
$60,000 plus a sum equal to her costs and expenses in pursuing
the action, “including attorney’s fees based on actual time
reasonably incurred . . . pursuant to Civil Code Section 1794(d),
to be determined by

This is the fifth and presumably final appeal in a lawsuit
which began in August 2014 as a garden variety commercial rent
dispute. In brief, Malibu Hillbillies LLC did not pay rent to its
landlord, appellant United Grand Corporation. United Grand
filed a civil action to recover the overdue rent from Malibu
Hillbillies and its guarantor, respondent Marcie Stollof.
Although a

Appellants Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser-CA, LLC, and Rasier, LLC
(collectively, Uber) challenge an order directing them to comply with administrative
subpoenas issued by the City Attorney of San Francisco (the City Attorney) for reports
and data submitted to the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC).1
We find that it was within the City Attorney’s investigative powers

Petitioners, Allied Signal Aerospace (Allied or employer)
and Constitution State Service Company (collectively
petitioners), sought issuance of a writ of review from this court
following a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals
Board (appeals board) concerning Maxine Wiggs (Wiggs or
employee) and her request for heavy housework assistance. The
writ of review was issu

This case concerns a massive, months-long leak from a
natural gas storage facility located just outside Los Angeles.
According to the allegations before us, the accident severely
harmed the economy of a nearby suburb. We must decide if local
businesses — none of which allege they suffered personal injury
or property damage — may recover in negligence for income lost
because

Health and Safety Code section 1799.110, subdivision (c)
states: “In any action for damages involving a claim of negligence
against a physician and surgeon providing emergency medical
coverage for a general acute care hospital emergency department,
the court shall admit expert medical testimony only from
physicians and surgeons who have had substantial professional
experien