|
|
|
|
New Haven, Connecticut insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory. |
|
John Mara v. Stephen Rilling, Edward Nook, Frederick Hine |
|
![]() On interlocutory appeal from an order denying summary judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Chatigny, J.), defendants contend that they are entitled to qualified immunity from plaintiffs suit charging them with violatin... More... $0 (04-10-2019 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARQUIS J. HARPER
Connecticut Judicial Branch |
|
. The defendant, Marquis J. Harper, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of attempt to commit robbery in the first degree as an accessory in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-8 (a), 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a-134 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to sustain his conviction and (2) the court i... More... $0 (08-05-2018 - CT) |
|
Tylon C. Outlaw v. City of Hartford
District of Connecticut Federal Courthouse - Hartford, Connecticut |
|
1 Appeal by plaintiff from so much of a judgment of the United States |
|
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRAYAN GOMEZ
United States Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit |
|
In March 2014, Hartford police detective James Campbell and 10 |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JERMAINE E. REDDICK
Connecticut Appellate Court |
|
The defendant, Jermaine E. Reddick, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered against him after a jury trial in the judicial district of New Haven, on charges of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (5), criminal possession of a firearm in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217 (a) (1), and assault in the third degree in violationofGeneralStatutes§ 53a... More... $0 (07-07-2017 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. EVER LEE HOLLEY
Connecticut Appellate Court |
|
Thedefendant,EverLee1Holley,appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of a narcotic substance with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury on reasonable doubt and (2) denied his motion to suppress evidence. We... More... $0 (07-07-2017 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANTHONY COLLYMORE
|
|
It is well established that the state may immunize from prosecution a witness called in its case-in-chief. See generally General Statutes § 54-47a. Theprimaryquestioninthisappealiswhetherthestate, after immunizing such a witness for testimony given during the states case-in-chief, may decline to extend that immunity to the same witness in connection with his testimony during the defense case-in-... More... $0 (10-22-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DAQUAN HOLMES
![]() |
|
The defendant, Daquan Holmes, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a54a1andcriminalattempttocommitmurderinviolation of General Statutes §§ 53a-492 and 53a-54a. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial, (2) the prosecutor engaged in prosecutoria... More... $0 (10-22-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DAQUAN HOLMES
![]() |
|
The defendant, Daquan Holmes, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a54a1andcriminalattempttocommitmurderinviolation of General Statutes §§ 53a-492 and 53a-54a. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial, (2) the prosecutor engaged in prosecutoria... More... $0 (10-08-2016 - CT) |
|
United States v. Ganias | |
In August 2003, agents of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Division |
|
United States of America v. Bradley W. Pattee | |
In April 2012, after using a peer-to-peer file sharing program to retrieve |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CRAIG HINES | |
The defendant, Craig Hines, was convicted, following a jury trial, of two counts of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a) and one count of carrying a pistol without a permit in violation ofGeneralStatutes§ 29-35(a).Onappeal,thedefendant claims that the court erred (1) in finding that he had been restored to competency to stand trial and (2) in removinghimfromthecourtroomduringjury... More... $0 (04-22-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ROBERT KING | |
In this certified appeal, we must determine whether a jurys verdict convicting the defendant, Robert King, of both intentional and reckless assault is inconsistent as a matter of law. The state appeals, following our grant of certification,1 from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the conviction of the defendant of two counts of assault in the first degree inviolationofGeneralStatutes§... More... $0 (04-21-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RUSSELL PEELER | |
This appeal requires us to consider the extent to which a criminal defendant is entitled to representation by a particular attorney at a new trial ordered in accordance with United States v. GonzalezLopez, 548 U.S. 140, 126 S. Ct. 2557, 165 L. Ed. 2d 409 (2006), as the remedy for the violation of his right to counsel of choice under the sixth amendment to the United States constitution, when that... More... $0 (03-16-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOSE JUSINO | |
The defendant, Jose Jusino, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, ofmurderinviolationofGeneralStatutes§ 53a-54aand capital felony in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 53a-54b (3).1 Section 53a-54b provides in relevant part: A person is guilty of a capital felony who is convicted of . . . (3) murder committed by one who has previously been convicted of... More... $0 (03-06-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RUBEN ROMAN | |
This direct appeal,following an inquiry into allegations of juror misconduct, comes to us almost sixteen years after the defendant, Ruben Roman, was convicted of murder in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 53a-54a, assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (1), criminal possession of a pistol in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 53a-217c (a... More... $0 (02-08-2016 - CT) |
|
State Of Connecticut v. Palencia | |
The defendant, Jorge Carrillo Palencia, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a court trial, of one count of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to sustain his convictionand(2)thecourtimproperlydismissedhispostsentencing motion to open the judgment of c... More... $0 (01-19-2016 - CT) |
|
United States v. Spruill | |
Defendant Jeff Spruill appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on |
|
State Of Connecticut v. Shelvonn Jones | |
The state and the defendant, Shelvonn |
|
State of Connecticut v. Abimael Ramos | |
Bridgeport, CT - Defendant convicted of killing longtime girlfriend |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. FRANCIS ANDERSON | |
This case raises the questions of whether a trial court may set a monetary bond as a condition of release when an insanity acquittee is charged with committing new, violent crimes while housed at a maximum security psychiatric facility and, if the acquittee cannot post that bond, whether he may be held in the custody of the Commissioner of Correctionat aprisonwhileawaiting trialonthe newcharges. A... More... $0 (10-23-2015 - CT) |
|
Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. CALCO Construction & Development Co | |
The dispute in the present case has a long and circuitous history, which began more than one decade ago when the plaintiff, Landmark InvestmentGroup,LLC(Landmark),acommercialrealestate developer, entered into a contract to purchase an environmentally contaminated property in the town of Plainville (town) with the hopes of remediating and developingitforcommercialuse.Theselleroftheproperty, Chung F... More... $0 (09-26-2015 - CT) |
|
Joseph General Contracting, Inc. v. Couto | |
The appellant Anthony J. Silvestri1 appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court in favor of the appellees, John Couto and Jane Couto.2 The trial court had found Silvestri personally liable for, inter alia, breach of contract, breach of implied warranty, and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA),GeneralStatutes§ 42-110aetseq.T... More... $0 (08-12-2015 - CT) |
|
Orson D. Munn, III v. The Hotchiss School | |
Cara Munn and her parents brought suit against the Hotchkiss |
|
Jacob Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation | |
A jury found that the defendant, the |
|
Jennifer Raspardo, et al. v. John Carlone, et al. | |
11 PlaintiffsâAppellees (the âplaintiffsâ), two former and one |
|
United States of America v. Stavros M. Ganias | |
In this case, defendant-appellant Stavros M. Ganias appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of tax evasion. He challenges the conviction on the grounds that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when the Government copied three of his computer hard drives pursuant to a search warrant and then retained files beyond the scope of the warrant for more than two-and-a-half ye... More... $0 (06-17-2014 - CT) |
|
State of Connecticut v. Hector M. | |
The defendant, Hector M., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of two counts of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1), two counts of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (2), two counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2)... More... $0 (02-24-2014 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RONALD BROWN | |
The dispositive issue in this certified |
|
Fairchild Heights Residents Association, Inc. v. Fairchild Heights, Inc. | |
The plaintiff, Fairchild Heights Residents |
|
Edwin Garcia v. Hartford Police Department | |
In a matter involving employment discrimination and First Amendment retaliation claims, Plaintiff-Appellant Edwin Garcia appeals from a September 27, 2011 final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Thompson, C.J.), granting summary judgment to the Defendants-Appellees. Garcia, a former sergeant with the City of Hartford Police Department (âHartford PDâ)... More... $0 (01-28-2013 - CT) |
|
Michael Sweeney v. Friends of Hammonasset | |
The plaintiff, Michael Sweeney, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendering summary judgment in favor of the defendants, the Friends of Hammonasset (Friends) and Deanna Becker. The plaintiff claims that the court concluded improperly that (1) the theory of liability set forth in his complaint sounded in premises liability, on which he could not prevail as a matter of law because the def... More... $0 (01-01-2013 - CT) |
|
Lost Trail, LLC v. Town of Weston | |
Approximately fifteen years ago, the plaintiff, Lost Trail, LLC (Lost Trail), purchased two adjacent parcels of land in the town of Weston (town). Lost Trailâs apparent intention was to divide the aggregated land into four lots suitable for building under the townâs zoning regulations. After Lost Trail reconfigured its property, consistent with this purpose, town officials informed Lost Trail ... More... $0 (01-10-2013 - CT) |
|
John Jarmie v. Frank Troncale | |
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a physician who fails to advise an unaware patient of the potential driving risks associated with her underlying medical condition breaches a duty to the victim of the patientâs unsafe driving because of the failure to advise. The plaintiff, John Jarmie, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Frank Troncale, a physic... More... $0 (09-24-2012 - CT) |
|
Sandhya Desmond v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. | |
The plaintiff, Sandhya Desmond, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her complaint against the defendants, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. (hospital), and Yale-New Haven Health Services, Inc., alleging workersâ compensation fraud; statutory negligence; breach of contract; violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.; and v... More... $0 (09-16-2012 - CT) |
|
Devore Associates, LLC v. Alan M. Sorkin | |
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly denied the motion of the defendant, Alan M. Sorkin, to open the judgment granting the application to compel arbitration filed by the plaintiff, Devore Associates, LLC, and defaulting the defendant for his failure to appear at the scheduled hearing on that application. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
|
Tamos Biro v. Victor H. Matz | |
This appeal originates from a contract for the purchase of commercial real estate in Danbury that was deeded to the buyers. The buyers appeal from the trial courtâs judgment granting the sellersâ motion for summary judgment. On appeal, the buyers claim the court erred in finding there was no material question of fact with respect to their claims of breach of contract, negligent misrepresentati... More... $0 (11-27-2011 - CT) |
|
Brenda J. Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital | |
The defendant, Mandell & Blau, M.D.âs, P.C.,1 appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court,2 reversing the judgment of the trial court rendered following a jury verdict in favor of the defendant. Sawicki v. New Britain General Hospital, 115 Conn. App. 25, 26, 971 A.2d 709 (2009). The defendant claims that the Appellate Court improperly concluded that the trial court improperly denied the mot... More... $0 (10-21-2011 - CT) |
|
Henry J. Martocchio v. Stephanie A. Savoir | |
The plaintiff, Henry J. Martocchio, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion for contempt brought by the defendants Roland Savoir and Tina Savoir1 (grandparents) and ordering that the plaintiff submit to a psychological evaluation. On appeal, the plaintiff claims, inter alia, that the court improperly concluded that he was in contempt of a previous court order and that the ... More... $0 (08-03-2011 - CT) |