|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Haven, Connecticut civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on an employment discrimination theory. |
|
|
|
New Haven, Connecticut civil litigation lawyer represented Defendant accused of violating the False Claims Act. |
|
|
|
New Haven, Connecticut civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1201, which provides, in part: |
|
|
|
New Haven, Connecticut qui tam lawyers represented the United United States, which sued Defendant on a False Claims Act Violation theory. |
|
United States of America v. City of Meriden, Connecticut |
|
New Haven, Connecticut civil rights lawyers. |
|
United States of America v. Rezart Rakaj and Kliton Rakaj |
|
![]() New Haven, CT - New Haven Property Owners Who Illegally Removed Asbestos are Sentenced REZART RAKAJ, 35, of Ansonia, and KLITON RAKAJ, 39, of Monroe, were sentenced in New Haven federal court for offenses related to the illegal and dangerous removal of asbestos at a New Have... More... $0 (04-01-2019 - CT) |
|
Donna L. Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLC, et al. |
|
![]() On December 14, 2012, twenty year old Adam Lanza forced his way into Sandy Hook Elemen- tary School in Newtown and, during the course of 264 seconds, fatally shot twenty first grade children and six staff members, and wounded two other staff members. Lanza carried... More... $0 (03-15-2019 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ALRICK A. EVANS
Connecticut Supreme Court |
|
The principal issue in this appeal is whether our decision in State v. Ray, 290 Conn. 602, 966 A.2d 148 (2009), which would require the defendant in the present case, Alrick A. Evans, to prove drug dependency as an affirmative defense to a charge under General Statutes (Rev. to 2011) 21a-278 (b),1 remains good law in light of (1) the subsequent decision of the United States Supreme Court in All... More... $0 (08-16-2018 - CT) |
|
Mr. P. and Mrs. P v. West Hartford Board of Education, et al.
District of Connecticut Federal Courthouse - New Haven, Connecticut |
|
The plaintiffs‐appellants, Mr. and Mrs. P. (the parents), commenced this |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. J.M.F.*
![]() |
|
The defendant, J.M.F., appeals from the judgment of conviction of attempt to commit murder in violation of General Statutes 53a-49 (a) (2) and 53a-54a (a), assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes 53a-59 (a) (1), and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes 53-21 (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant raises the following seven claims:(1)thetrialcourtabusedi... More... $0 (01-03-2017 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. GEORGE MICHAEL LENIART | |
The defendant, George Michael Leniart, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes 53a-54a (a),1 and three counts of capital felony in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1995) 53a54b (5), (7) and (9), as amended by Public Acts 1995, No. 95-16, 4.2 The defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a... More... $0 (06-07-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. WILLIAM CASTILLO | |
The defendant, William Castillo, appealsfromthejudgmentofconviction,renderedafter a jury trial, of attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes 53a-49 and 53a-134 (a) (3), and attempt to commit robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes 53a49 and 53a-135 (a) (1) (A). The defendant, who was nearly seventeen years old at the time of his arr... More... $0 (05-18-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JEFFREY T. CONNOR | |
In State v. Connor, 292 Conn. 483, 487, 533, 973 A.2d 627 (2009), this court remanded the criminalcaseofthedefendant,JeffreyT.Connor,tothe trial court with direction to reconsider the defendants competency to represent himself in light of a new standard that this court adopted in the defendants direct appeal. Following that remand, the trial court concludedthatthedefendanthadbeencompetenttorepr... More... $0 (05-14-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. CRAIG HINES | |
The defendant, Craig Hines, was convicted, following a jury trial, of two counts of murder in violation of General Statutes 53a-54a (a) and one count of carrying a pistol without a permit in violation ofGeneralStatutes 29-35(a).Onappeal,thedefendant claims that the court erred (1) in finding that he had been restored to competency to stand trial and (2) in removinghimfromthecourtroomduringjury... More... $0 (04-22-2016 - CT) |
|
Martin Franchises, Inc. v. Cooper U.S., Inc. | |
Thedefendant,CooperU.S.,Inc.,appeals following the trial courts rendering of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Martin Franchises, Inc. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred in rendering summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the following two grounds: (1) the court improperly concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact;and(2)thecourtheldthedefendantt... More... $0 (04-04-2016 - CT) |
|
United States v. Litvak | |
|
|
United States v. Litvak | |
ThechargesinthiscasearisefromLitvaksconductasasecuritiesbrokerandtraderatJefferies&Company(Jefferies),a |
|
Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. Pasiak | |
In this declaratory judgment action, the plaintiffs, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, appealfromthejudgmentof thetrialcourtdetermining that, pursuant to a personal umbrella insurance policy issued by theplaintiffs in favor ofthe defendant Jeffrey S. Pasiak,1 the plaintiffs had a duty to defend the defendantandtoindemnifyhimfordamagesawardedagainst ... More... $0 (11-02-2015 - CT) |
|
Tavani v. Riley | |
The plaintiff, Michael Tavani, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action for adeclaratory judgment. On appeal,the plaintiff claims that the court improperly dismissed his action, sua sponte, on the ground that his case was not justiciable.1 We agree, and reverse the judgment of the trial court. The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the plaintiffs clai... More... $0 (10-19-2015 - CT) |
|
United States of America v. Hai T. Le | |
New Haven, CT - West Hartford Tax Preparer to Serve Time in Prison for Filing False Returns |
|
Campos v. Coleman | |
The named plaintiff, Gregoria Campos, in her individual capacity and in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of her late husband, Jose Mauricio Campos (decedent), and the Campos three children, Mauricio Campos, Jose Ernesto Campos and Jose Eduardo Campos(Campos children),brought this action against the defendants, Robert E. Coleman and LQ Management, LLC (LQ Management).2 The plaintiffs a... More... $0 (09-28-2015 - CT) |
|
Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. CALCO Construction & Development Co | |
The dispute in the present case has a long and circuitous history, which began more than one decade ago when the plaintiff, Landmark InvestmentGroup,LLC(Landmark),acommercialrealestate developer, entered into a contract to purchase an environmentally contaminated property in the town of Plainville (town) with the hopes of remediating and developingitforcommercialuse.Theselleroftheproperty, Chung F... More... $0 (09-26-2015 - CT) |
|
Orson D. Munn, III v. The Hotchiss School | |
Cara Munn and her parents brought suit against the Hotchkiss |
|
James Briggs v. Roderick Bremby | |
11 Plaintiff James Briggs brings this suit under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against the |
|
Jacob Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation | |
A jury found that the defendant, the |
|
Carmen L. Lopez v. Board of Education of the City of Bridgeport, et al. | |
An action seeking a writ of quo warranto |
|
Marianne Olson v. Fusaini Mohammadu | |
The question that we must resolve in |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RONALD BROWN | |
The dispositive issue in this certified |
|
Fairchild Heights Residents Association, Inc. v. Fairchild Heights, Inc. | |
The plaintiff, Fairchild Heights Residents |
|
Joseph Fortin v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company | |
The plaintiffs, Joseph Fortin, Samuel Kofkoff, Robert Kofkoff and Kofkoff Egg Farm, LLC, in this civil action concerning insurance benefits appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant North River Insurance Company.1 The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) granted the defendant’s motion to preclude testimony from one of the plaintiffs’ witnesses, (2) granted s... More... $0 (01-10-2013 - CT) |
|
Craig Urgin v. William Baker | |
In this consolidated appeal, the plaintiffs in the first action (SC 18643), Craig Ugrin and Samantha Ugrin, and the plaintiffs in the second action (SC 18644), William Baker and Lisa Baker, appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the named defendant, the town of Cheshire (town).1 The plaintiffs filed virtually identical complaints against the town after a massive sinkhole developed... More... $0 (10-30-2012 - CT) |
|
Linda Coolick v. Abigail Hughes | |
This is an appeal from a denial of a renewed motion for summary judgment by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Eginton, J.). Defendant-Appellant Abigail Hughes (“Hughes”), the Superintendent of the Connecticut Technical High School System, renewed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that she is entitled to qualified immunity in this § 1983 action in which Hug... More... $0 (10-25-2012 - CT) |
|
John Jarmie v. Frank Troncale | |
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a physician who fails to advise an unaware patient of the potential driving risks associated with her underlying medical condition breaches a duty to the victim of the patient’s unsafe driving because of the failure to advise. The plaintiff, John Jarmie, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Frank Troncale, a physic... More... $0 (09-24-2012 - CT) |
|
Maria E. Mills v. The Solution, LLC | |
The plaintiff, Maria E. Mills, executrix of the estate of Clarence Israel Mills (decedent), appeals from the summary judgments rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants the city of Bridgeport (city); Philip C. Handy, the director of the city’s department of parks and recreation; Anthony Armeno, the city’s acting chief of police at the time of the subject incident; 5 Star Amusement... More... $0 (09-16-2012 - CT) |
|
Mark C. Langley v. Oxana V. Langley | |
The plaintiff, Mark C. Langley, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in connection with the underlying dissolution action in which the trial court entered several financial orders.1 The plaintiff claims that the trial court, in fashioning its financial orders, improperly (1) considered the entire length of the parties’ relationship, rather than the length of the marriage at issu... More... $0 (08-21-2012 - CT) |
|
Rajiv Sethi v. Bruhan Yagildere | |
The plaintiff, Rajiv Sethi, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Bruhan Yagildere. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that he lacked standing to allege unjust enrichment and a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practice Act (CUTPA).1 We conclude that, although the trial court correctly determined that the ... More... $0 (07-17-2012 - CT) |
|
Adriana Ruiz v. Victory Properties, LLC | |
The plaintiffs, Adriana Ruiz and Olga Rivera,1 appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Victory Properties, LLC.2 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly concluded that, under the undisputed facts of the case, the defendant owed them no duty. We agree with the plaintiffs and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court. |
|
Gladys Kronovitter v. Richard Doyle | |
In this action for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff Gladys Kronovitter1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial by jury, in favor of the defendants, Richard Doyle and Kelly Fitch. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) instructed the jury to consider the elements of certain statutory infractions in relation to the element of probable cause, (... More... $0 (05-01-2012 - CT) |
|
Patrick Wood v. Club, LLC | |
The defendant Club, LLC, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, following a jury trial, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Patrick Wood.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court improperly allowed the plaintiff’s expert to testify, (2) the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on liability for actions of third parties, (3) the evidence was insufficient to establish that... More... $0 (04-17-2012 - CT) |