|
|
|
|
New Haven, Connecticut criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with participating in an armed robbery of a gas station in North New Haven. |
|
United States of America v. Donald Cariati, Jr. |
|
Hartford, CT - The United States of America charged Donald Cariati, Jr., age 45, with obstruction of justice. According to court documents and statements made in court today, Cariati owns and operates Cariati Developers Inc. (CDI), a snowplow and hauling ... More... $0 (08-23-2020 - CT) |
|
United States of America v. Antoine Snell and Treyquane Snell |
|
Bridgeport, CT - The United States of America charged Antoine Snell and Treyquane Snell with committing violent robberies and car jacking. |
|
United States of America v. Ron Christopher Spear-Zuleta, Aninha Spear-Zuleta and Maritz Torres |
|
New Haven, CT - Three Individuals Plead Guilty to Participating in Drug-Related Robbery RON CHRISTOPHER SPEAR-ZULETA, also known as Chris, 46, of Woodbridge; ANINHA SPEAR-ZULETA, 32, of Woodbridge, and MARITZA TORRES, also known as Lisy, 35, of New Haven, pleaded guilty ... More... $0 (09-12-2019 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ALRICK A. EVANS
Connecticut Supreme Court |
|
The principal issue in this appeal is whether our decision in State v. Ray, 290 Conn. 602, 966 A.2d 148 (2009), which would require the defendant in the present case, Alrick A. Evans, to prove drug dependency as an affirmative defense to a charge under General Statutes (Rev. to 2011) § 21a-278 (b),1 remains good law in light of (1) the subsequent decision of the United States Supreme Court in All... More... $0 (08-16-2018 - CT) |
|
United States of America v. Floyd Rose
Southern District of New York - New York, New York |
|
Defendant‐appellant Floyd Rose appeals the order of the United States |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RICARDO SWILLINGConnecticut Supreme Court |
|
The defendant, Ricardo Swilling, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-92 (a) (2) (A), home invasion in violation of General Statutes § 53a-100aa (a) (2), and assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2).1 Additionally, following the defendants pleas of no... More... $0 (03-31-2018 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANTHONY C. MANOUSOSConnecticut Judicial Branch |
|
. The defendant, Anthony C. Manousos, appealsfromthejudgmentofconviction,renderedafter a jury trial, of arson in the first degree in violation of GeneralStatutes§ 53a-111(a)(1).Thedefendantclaims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motions to suppress various tangible items collected from him, as well as oral statements that he made to the police during an investigatory stop and subsequ... More... $0 (01-19-2018 - CT) |
|
STATE CONNECTICUT v. EFRAIN JOHNSON | |
.Thedefendant,EfrainJohnson,appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of felony murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54c and one count of kidnapping in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a92 (a) (2) (A) for his participation in events that led to the death of the victim, Tina Johnson.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the... More... $0 (05-07-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ORLANDO BERRIOS, JR. | |
This appeal requires us to consider the continuing vitality of the presumption of prejudice injurytamperingcasesarticulated bytheUnitedStates Supreme Court in Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 74 S. Ct. 450, 98 L. Ed. 654 (1954) (Remmer I), which is a question that has divided state and federal courts for more than thirty years in the wake of Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 102 S. Ct. 940, ... More... $0 (04-12-2016 - CT) |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DANIEL B.* | |
The defendant, Daniel B., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of attempt to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-54a. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, (2) the trial court unduly restricted his access to certain information regarding a confidential informant who testified ... More... $0 (03-28-2016 - CT) |
|
United States of America v. Marlon Patterson aka Head | |
Danbury Man Sentenced to 16 Years in Federal Prison for Armed Home Invasions |
|
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JAMES MICHAEL FASANELLI | |
The defendant, James Michael Fasanelli,appealsfromthejudgmentofconviction,rendered after a jury trial, of one count of sale of narcotics by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of GeneralStatutes§ 21a-278(b).Onappeal,thedefendant claims that he was deprived of his constitutional right to a fair trial as a result of prosecutorial impropriety duringclosingarguments.Wedisagreethattheprose... More... $0 (02-05-2016 - CT) |
|
State Of Connecticut v. Shelvonn Jones | |
The state and the defendant, Shelvonn |
|
Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. CALCO Construction & Development Co | |
The dispute in the present case has a long and circuitous history, which began more than one decade ago when the plaintiff, Landmark InvestmentGroup,LLC(Landmark),acommercialrealestate developer, entered into a contract to purchase an environmentally contaminated property in the town of Plainville (town) with the hopes of remediating and developingitforcommercialuse.Theselleroftheproperty, Chung F... More... $0 (09-26-2015 - CT) |
|
Sensational Smiles LLC DBA Smile Bright v. Dr. Jewel Mullen et al. | |
2 The question in this case is whether a Connecticut rule restricting the |
|
United States of America v. David Haney | |
Deirdre M. Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, announced that DAVID HANEY, 53, of Marlborough, was sentenced today by U.S. District Judge Stefan R. Underhill in Bridgeport to 60 months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release, for robbing five Connecticut pharmacies last year. |
|
United States of America v. Stavros M. Ganias | |
In this case, defendant-appellant Stavros M. Ganias appeals from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of tax evasion. He challenges the conviction on the grounds that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated when the Government copied three of his computer hard drives pursuant to a search warrant and then retained files beyond the scope of the warrant for more than two-and-a-half ye... More... $0 (06-17-2014 - CT) |
|
Lisa Zalaski v. City of Hartford | |
In this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiffs, the Animal Rights Front, Inc. (âARFâ) and two of its members, Lisa Zalaski and Derek V. Oatis, appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Vanessa L. Bryant, Judge), entered after a bench trial in favor of defendant, Hartford Police Sergeant Daniel Albert, on claims that Albert violated pl... More... $0 (07-23-2013 - CT) |
|
Catherine O. Duncan v. Mill Management Company of Greenwicch, Inc. | |
This appeal arises from a negligence action brought by the plaintiff, Catherine O. Duncan, against the defendants, Mill Management Company of Greenwich, Inc. (management company), and the Greenwich Chateau Condominium Association (condo- minium association), after the plaintiff fell and was injured when stepping down from the roof deck of the Greenwich Chateau Condominiums (condominium building), ... More... $0 (02-21-2013 - CT) |
|
Joseph Fortin v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company | |
The plaintiffs, Joseph Fortin, Samuel Kofkoff, Robert Kofkoff and Kofkoff Egg Farm, LLC, in this civil action concerning insurance benefits appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant North River Insurance Company.1 The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) granted the defendantâs motion to preclude testimony from one of the plaintiffsâ witnesses, (2) granted s... More... $0 (01-10-2013 - CT) |
|
Craig Urgin v. William Baker | |
In this consolidated appeal, the plaintiffs in the first action (SC 18643), Craig Ugrin and Samantha Ugrin, and the plaintiffs in the second action (SC 18644), William Baker and Lisa Baker, appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the named defendant, the town of Cheshire (town).1 The plaintiffs filed virtually identical complaints against the town after a massive sinkhole developed... More... $0 (10-30-2012 - CT) |
|
Americao D'Appollonio, Jr. v. Sarina Griffo-Brandao | |
The plaintiffs, Americo DâAppollonio, Jr., and Carmela L. DâAppollonio, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a court trial, in favor of the defendants, Sarina Griffo-Brandao and her father, Pasquale Griffo, on their claims arising from the defendantsâ partial construction of two retaining walls in an easement area located on Griffo-Brandaoâs property in a residential... More... $0 (10-02-2012 - CT) |
|
John Jarmie v. Frank Troncale | |
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a physician who fails to advise an unaware patient of the potential driving risks associated with her underlying medical condition breaches a duty to the victim of the patientâs unsafe driving because of the failure to advise. The plaintiff, John Jarmie, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Frank Troncale, a physic... More... $0 (09-24-2012 - CT) |
|
Schaghticoke Indian Tribe v. Michael J. Rost | |
The self-represented defendant in this summary process eviction action, Michael J. Rost, appeals from the trial courtâs judgment of possession rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, the Schaghticoke Indian Tribe (SIT) and the Schaghticoke Tribal Nation (STN). The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) exercised jurisdiction by adjudicating a summary process action involving sovereign reser... More... $0 (09-16-2012 - CT) |
|
Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Chung Family Realty Partnership, LLC | |
The defendant, Chung Family Realty Partnership, LLC, appeals from the trial courtâs order granting the application for a prejudgment remedy filed by the plaintiff, Landmark Investment Group, LLC. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the doctrine of res judicata prevents the plaintiff from relitigating issues that have been or could have been litigated in the first litigation; and (2) the cou... More... $0 (08-28-2012 - CT) |
|
Scott E. Hurlburt v. Scott D. Derosa | |
This action involves a claimed drainage easement over property owned by the defendants, Scott D. DeRosa, Carl F. DeRosa, Patricia A. DeRosa and Cori DeRosa Quirk. The plaintiff, Scott E. Hurlburt, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the granting of the defendantsâ motion for a judgment of dismissal for failure to make out a prima facie case. Specifically, the plaintiff cl... More... $0 (08-14-2012 - CT) |
|
Mark C. Langley v. Oxana V. Langley | |
The plaintiff, Mark C. Langley, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in connection with the underlying dissolution action in which the trial court entered several financial orders.1 The plaintiff claims that the trial court, in fashioning its financial orders, improperly (1) considered the entire length of the partiesâ relationship, rather than the length of the marriage at issu... More... $0 (08-21-2012 - CT) |
|
Allison Downs v. Orlito A. Trias | |
The defendant, Orlito A. Trias,1 an obstetrician and gynecologist, appeals2 from the judgment of the trial court, after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Allison Downs,3 with respect to the allegations that the defendantâs negligence resulted in the plaintiff developing ovarian cancer. The defendant contends that, because the plaintiffâs complaint turned on the defendantâs failure to ... More... $0 (08-27-2012 - CT) |
|
Felicia Pierot Brody v. Cary Brody | |
The defendant, Cary Brody, appeals from judgments of the trial court rendered in connection with the underlying dissolution action awarding to the plaintiff, Felicia Pierot Brody, a $2.5 million lump sum alimony payment and granting the plaintiffâs two postjudgment motions for contempt. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) rendered its judgment dissolving the partiesâ marri... More... $0 (07-17-2012 - CT) |
|
MSO, LLC v. Anthony Desimone | |
The plaintiff, MSO, LLC, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the defendants Anthony DeSimone and Charles DeSimone, Jr., in their personal capacities and as coexecutors of the estate of Charles E. DeSimone, to stay the proceedings and ordering the parties to proceed to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause in the partiesâ lease agreement.1 On appeal, the pl... More... $0 (04-17-2012 - CT) |
|
Cecil Young v. City of Bridgeport | |
The plaintiff, Cecil Young, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, the city of Bridgeport. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly rendered judgment for the defendant on the basis of its factual finding that the plaintiff was not the defendantâs employee. We agree with the courtâs finding that the plaintiff was not the defendantâs e... More... $0 (05-17-2012 - CT) |
|
G. Berry Schumann v. Dianon Systems, Inc. | |
In Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410, 421, 126 S. Ct. 1951, 164 L. Ed. 2d 689 (2006), the United States Supreme Court concluded ââthat when public employees make statements pursuant to their official duties, the employees are not speaking as citizens for [f]irst [a]mendment1 purposes, and the [c]onstitution does not insulate their communications from employer discipline.ââ The principal i... More... $0 (05-01-2012 - CT) |
|
Ourania Argentinis v. Lisa Fortuna | |
Connecticut courts are solicitous of selfrepresented parties when it does not interfere with the rights of other parties. See Watkins v. Thomas, 118 Conn. App. 452, 456, 984 A.2d 106 (2009). Our courts allow self-represented parties some latitude, but that latitude is constrained by our rules of practice; see, e.g., Oliphant v. Commissioner of Correction, 274 Conn. 563, 569â70, 877 A.2d 761 (200... More... $0 (04-04-2012 - CT) |
|
Eric Fischer v. Richard Zollino | |
This case raises the question of whether the putative father of a child, upon learning that he was deceived by his wife, the childâs mother, and the childâs biological father as to the childâs paternity, is estopped from recovering from the biological father funds that the putative father expended to raise the child while believing her to be his offspring. The plaintiff, Eric Fischer, appeal... More... $0 (02-07-2012 - CT) |
|
Zygmunt Golek v. Saint Mary's Hospital, Inc. | |
This case concerns the propriety of a decision by a hospital that conducts an accredited surgical residency training program to decline to promote a senior resident to the position of chief resident. |
|
Ghassan Saleh v. Ribeiro Trucking, LLC | |
In this certified appeal, we must examine the delicate balance between two of the most basic principles of our law: the constitutional right of litigants to have the jury determine the amount of damages awarded; and the trial courtâs broad authority to supervise the trial process. The defendant Ribeiro Trucking, LLC,1 appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court,2 which reversed the judgment... More... $0 (12-27-2011 - CT) |
|
Wiacek Farms, LLC v. City of Shelton | |
The defendant Mark A. Lauretti1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for summary judgment, which asserted that the doctrine of collateral estoppel barred the action brought by the plaintiff, Wiacek Farms, LLC. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
|
Theresa P. O'Connor v. Dorothy Larocque | |
The defendant, Dorothy Larocque, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court quieting title to certain real property in favor of the named plaintiff, 2 Theresa P. OâConnor, predicated on a finding that the plaintiff had disseized the defendant of her interest in the property as a tenant in common. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly determined that the plaintiff had overcome t... More... $0 (10-31-2011 - CT) |
|
American Diamond Exchange, Inc. v. Scott Alpert | |
The defendant Jurgita Karobkaite1 appeals2 from the judgment of the trial court, following a remand from the Appellate Court; see American Diamond Exchange, Inc. v. Alpert, 101 Conn. App. 83, 920 A.2d 357, cert. denied, 284 Conn. 901, 931 A.2d 261 (2007); for a recalculation of damages based on the existing record. On remand, the trial court awarded $103,355.68 in damages to the plaintiff, America... More... $0 (10-21-2011 - CT) |