|
|
|
Robert Martin v. City of Boise |
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread. Anatole France, The Red Lily We consider whether the Eighth Amendments prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment bars a city from p... More... $0 (09-04-2018 - ID) |
Animal Legal Defense Fund, et al. v. Lawrence G. Wasden
District of Idaho Federal Courthouse - Boise, Idaho |
Investigative journalism has long been a fixture in the American press, particularly with regard to food safety.1 In the early 1900s, Upton Sinclair highlighted conditions in the meat-packing industry in The Jungle, a novel based on his time working incognito in a packing plant.2 This case also originates in the agricultural sector�a secretly-filmed expos� of the operation of an Idaho dairy fa... More... $0 (01-09-2018 - ID) |
United States of America v. Theodore Pena |
Boise, ID - Meridian Man Sentenced to 12 Months in Prison for Oxycodone Distribution |
Greater Boise Auditorium District v. Frazier |
The District is a governmental subdivision that is organized under Idaho Code section 674901 and operates in Boise. The District currently operates the Boise Centre, a convention center in Downtown Boise. The District seeks to expand operations by acquiring a new facility (hereinafter the Centre Facility) being constructed near the Boise Centre. But the District, as a governmental subdivision, is ... More... $0 (10-15-2015 - ID) |
Idaho Transportation v. Ascorp, Inc. |
While somewhat convoluted in its background, this appeal stems from a dispute over amounts due and owing under a state highway contract. Debco Construction and ITD entered into a contract whereby Debco agreed to provide construction services on a state highway project in Twin Falls, Idaho, known as the Washington Street Project. The contract included a process (Specifications) for adjustment of t... More... $0 (09-26-2015 - ID) |
STATE OF IDAHO V. COEUR D'ALENE TRIBE |
As this appeal hinges on the regulation of Indian gaming, we begin with a brief introduction to the IGRA. Congress passed the IGRA in 1988 in order to provide a statutory basis for the operation and regulation of gaming by Indian tribes. Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 48 (1996). The Act divides gaming on Indian lands into three classesI, II, and IIIand provides a different... More... $0 (07-25-2015 - ID) |
State of Idaho v. Coeru d'Alene Tribe |
The Coeur dAlene Tribe (Tribe) appeals the |
Susan Latta v. C.L. Otter, "Butch"; Governor of the State of Idaho |
Both Idaho and Nevada have passed statutes and enacted constitutional |
Camp Easton Forever, Inc. v. Inland Northwest Council of Boy Scouts of America |
Camp Easton Forever, Inc., (âCEFâ) and Daniel and Matthew Edwards (collectively âthe Edwardsesâ) appealed the district courtâs grant of summary judgment to Inland Northwest Council Endowment Properties, LLC, and Inland Northwest Council of the Boy Scouts of America (collectively âINWCâ). CEF and the Edwardses filed an action to declare the partiesâ rights to property INWC owns on L... More... $0 (08-15-2014 - ID) |
Reed J. Taylor v. Richard A. Riley |
This is a permissive appeal out of Ada County from an order denying the appellantsâ motions for summary judgment. The central issue is whether an attorney who, as counsel for a corporation, issues an opinion letter stating that a stock redemption agreement does not violate the law can be held liable to the shareholder whose stock was redeemed if the opinion was incorrect and the redemption agree... More... $0 (08-27-2014 - ID) |
Kenton D. Johnson v. Highway 101 Investments, LLC |
The dominant owners of an easement appeal from an adverse grant of summary judgment dismissing all of their claims, which were premised on the servient ownerâs construction of a permanent sign within the easement. The sign effectively reduced the width of the easement from twenty-five feet to nineteen feet at one point along its length. On appeal, the dominant owners argue that the district cour... More... $0 (02-07-2014 - ID) |
John M. McVicars v. Bret Christensen |
This appeal arises from a Nez Perce County district courtâs finding that Bret and Eddieka Christensenâs building constituted a private nuisance to John and Julie McVicars. In 2006, the Christensens began construction of a fabric building adjacent to the property line shared with the McVicarses. After its completion, the McVicarses filed a nuisance action alleging that increased noise, traffic,... More... $0 (02-10-2014 - ID) |
Bradley K. Morgan v. New Sweden Irrigation District |
This case arose after New Sweden Irrigation District ("New Sweden") mowed the canal |
Terrie H. Rowley v. Ada County Highway District |
Ada County Highway District (âACHDâ) appeals the district courtâs grant of summary judgment to Terrie Rowley. This case concerns the ownership of a ten-foot-wide walkway in a Boise subdivision and arose after Rowley sought an injunction to remove a shed her neighbor placed on that walkway. The district court held that (1) the subdivision plats showed the original developers clearly and unequ... More... $0 (04-08-2014 - ID) |
Dennis Lyle Akers v. D.L. White Construction, Inc. |
This appeal arises from a bench trial concerning an easement and trespass dispute. David and Michelle White, and D.L. White Construction, Inc. appeal from the district courtâs judgment regarding the scope and location of the Whitesâ easement across Dennis and Sherrie Akersâ property and the district courtâs award of compensatory and punitive damages for trespass and emotional distress. We ... More... $0 (02-07-2014 - ID) |
Melaleuca, Inc. v. Rick Foeller |
In 1999, Rick and Natalie Foeller apparently1 entered into an agreement with Melaleuca of Canada, Inc., under which the Foellers were to act as independent marketing executives in exchange for monthly commission payments. In 2008, the Foellers breached this agreement but Melaleuca continued to pay them commissions because it was unaware of the breach. Upon learning of the breach, Melaleuca sued to... More... $0 (02-07-2014 - ID) |
Kenton D. Johnson v. Highway 101 Investments, LLC |
The dominant owners of an easement appeal from an adverse grant of summary judgment dismissing all of their claims, which were premised on the servient ownerâs construction of a permanent sign within the easement. The sign effectively reduced the width of the easement from twenty-five feet to nineteen feet at one point along its length. On appeal, the dominant owners argue that the district cour... More... $0 (02-07-2014 - ID) |
John M. McVicars v. Bret Christensen |
This appeal arises from a Nez Perce County district courtâs finding that Bret and Eddieka Christensenâs building constituted a private nuisance to John and Julie McVicars. In 2006, the Christensens began construction of a fabric building adjacent to the property line shared with the McVicarses. After its completion, the McVicarses filed a nuisance action alleging that increased noise, traffic,... More... $0 (12-27-2013 - ID) |
David M. Evans v. Shoshone-Bannock Land Use Policy Commission |
In this appeal, we consider whether the Shoshone- Bannock Tribes plausibly have the authority to regulate the land use of David Evans, a nonmember of the Tribes, who owns land in fee simple within the Fort Hall Reservation.1 Acknowledging the general rule that tribes may not regulate nonmember conduct on such ânon-Indian fee land,â the district court nevertheless held that the Tribes had a pla... More... $0 (12-05-2013 - ID) |
George Martin v. Ed Smith |
Appellant, Camas County, appeals an injunction granted by the district court against the enforcement of Camas County Ordinances 150 and 153, and Resolutions 96 and 103 (â2007 zoning amendmentsâ). Camas County challenges the standing of Plaintiff-Respondent, George Martin (âMartinâ), in light of this Courtâs recent decision in Martin v. Camas County, 150 Idaho 508, 509â11, 248 P.3d 1243... More... $0 (02-01-2013 - ID) |
Kootenai County v. Peggy Harriman-Sayler |
Kootenai County (the County) and Panhandle Health District No. 1 (the District) filed an action against Peggy Harriman-Sayler1 and Terry Sayler, seeking injunctive relief to prevent Sayler from operating a recreational vehicle (RV) park without a conditional use permit, from occupying or using a building without a certificate of occupancy, and from operating a subsurface sewage system without a pe... More... $0 (12-20-2012 - ID) |
Russell Peterson v. Laura Knight Peterson |
This case comes before this Court on an appeal from a magistrate courtâs determination on custody and visitation of minor children in a divorce proceeding. In a memorandum decision, the magistrate court awarded the parties joint legal custody of the children, with primary physical custody awarded to the mother. The father, Russell Peterson (Russell), alleges on appeal that the magistrate court a... More... $0 (07-17-2012 - ID) |
Russell Peterson v. Laura Knight Peterson |
custody of the children, with primary physical custody awarded to the mother. The father, Russell Peterson (Russell), alleges on appeal that the magistrate court abused its discretion by awarding unequal visitation time to the mother, Laura Peterson (Laura), and by allowing the mother to move to Utah with the children. We affirm the decision of the magistrate court. |
Frank Ronald Marek v. Earl A. Lawrence |
This case concerns the appeal of Frank Ronald Marek and Gayle Marek (the Mareks) of the district courtâs decision and judgment decreeing the locations of two boundary lines in dispute between the Mareks and Earl A. Lawrence and Sandra L. Lawrence (the Lawrences). As the deed at question in this appeal was unambiguous, we find that the district court impermissibly consulted evidence outside of th... More... $0 (05-30-2012 - ID) |
Lower Payette Ditch Company v. Robert L. Harveny |
This is an appeal challenging the district courtâs ruling that appellants were not the sole prevailing parties in this litigation. We affirm the judgment of the district court. |
Ronald R. McCann v. William V. McCann |
This case involves an ongoing dispute between Ron McCann (Ron) and his brother William McCann, Jr. (Bill) concerning the operation of McCann Ranch & Livestock Company, Inc. (Corporation), a closely-held corporation created by their father, William McCann, Sr. (William, Sr.). In 1997, William, Sr.âs shares passed to a trust set up to benefit his wife Gertrude McCann (Gertrude), with Gary Meisner ... More... $0 (01-10-2012 - ID) |
T.J.T., Inc. v. Ulysses Mori |
This is T.J.T., Inc.âs second appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Ulysses Mori, in which the district court found that the non-competition agreement Mori allegedly breached was unenforceable under California law. Because we find that the district court erred in failing to consider whether and to what extent the agreement could be âblue penciledâ to make it enforceable, we vacate the s... More... $0 (11-30-2011 - ID) |
Stuart MacKay v. Four Rivers Packing Co. |
This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Stuart Mackay (Mackay) against Four Rivers Packing Co. (Four Rivers), finding that Four Rivers breached a contract for long-term employment. Four Riversâ appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict, the adequacy of the trial courtâs jury instructions regarding contract formation, and the... More... $0 (07-28-2011 - ID) |
Jacklin Land Company v. Blue Dog RV |
This is an appeal from a summary judgment holding that the defendants violated restrictive covenants in a commercial development. Because the district court misapplied the applicable law, we vacate the judgment. |
Twin Lakes Canal Company v. Warren Choules |
At issue in this case is the interpretation of I.C. § 5-246, which provides for obtaining prescriptive overflow easements. Appellant Twin Lakes Canal Company (Twin Lakes) owns and operates Twin Lakes Reservoir. Respondents Warren Choules and Sessilee J. Choules, Trustee of the Choules Family Trust, (the Choules) own property subject to a prescriptive overflow easement obtained by Twin Lakes under... More... $0 (05-27-2011 - ID) |
David L. Caldwell v. Thomas W. Cometto |
Appellants challenge the district courtâs refusal to allow the removal of trees within and adjacent to an access-road easement in favor of Appellants running over property belonging to their neighbors, the Comettos. Because there is substantial evidence that the trees do not unreasonably hinder maintenance or snow removal, the district courtâs order is affirmed. The district courtâs denial o... More... $0 (05-26-2011 - ID) |
George Kelley v. Warren Yadon |
This is an appeal from a judgment holding that the Plaintiffs are beneficiaries of a resulting trust in land titled in the names of the Defendants. We affirm the judgment. |
Chantell Sackett v. United States Environmental Protection Agency |
We determine whether federal courts have subject-matter jurisdiction to conduct review of administrative compliance orders issued by the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319(a)(3), before the EPA has filed a lawsuit in federal court to enforce the compliance order. We join our sister circuits and hold that the Clean Water Act precludes pre-enforcement ... More... $0 (09-17-2010 - ID) |
Wayne Dawson v. Cheyovich Family Trust |
Wayne Dawson appeals from various district court orders that resulted in John N. Bach receiving a three-quarter interest in certain real property. We remand the case to the district court for it to rule on Dawsonâs I.R.C.P. 60(b)(6) motion. |
Ralph H. Henderson v. Henderson Investment Properties, L.L.C. |
Appellant, Ralph Henderson (Ralph), his deceased wife, Lena Henderson (Lena), along with Respondents, their son, Roger Henderson (Roger), and daughter-in-law, Lisa Henderson (Lisa), created a business known as Henderson Investment Properties, L.L.C. (HIP). The sole purpose of HIP was to operate a Jimmie Johnâs Gourmet Sandwich Shop in Pocatello, Idaho. When forming HIP, all four parties signed a... More... $0 (11-30--0001 - ID) |
Howard Houston v. John Hunting Whittier |
This is an appeal from a judgment on causes of action based upon Oregon statutes. We hold that the most significant relationship test applicable to a conflict of laws issue does not apply and that the district court did not err in allowing recovery based upon the Oregon statutes. We also hold that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment on those claims. We affirm the judgment o... More... $0 (08-21-2009 - ID) |
Ed Terrazas and Jackie Weseloh v. Blaine County, Idaho |
This appeal arises from a petition for judicial review concerning a county boardâs denial of a subdivision application. Appellants Ed Terrazas and Jackie Weseloh (Applicants) appeal the district courtâs order affirming Respondent Blaine County Board of County Commissionersâ (Board) decision denying Applicantsâ subdivision application. We affirm the decision of the district court. |
The University of Idaho Foundation, Inc. v. Civic Partners, Inc., et al. |
This is an appeal from a partial judgment holding that the University of Idaho Foundation is obligated to make payments under a contract between it and Civic Partners Idaho, LLC, and from the award of costs and attorney fees to the Capital City Development Corporation. We affirm the judgment of the district court and award attorney fees on appeal to the Capital City Development Corporation. |
United States of America and Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. FMC Corporation |
In the late 1990s, Plaintiff United States and Intervenor Shoshone-Bannock Tribes ("the Tribes") approached Defendant FMC Corporation, a mining company operating in Idaho, about potential violations of federal and tribal environmental laws. FMC reached an agreement with each party. FMC agreed to pay the Tribes $1.5 million per year in lieu of applying for certain tribal permits. Concerning f... More... $0 (06-27-2008 - ID) |