|
State of New Mexico v. Manual Sandoval |
Albuquerque, NM - Criminal defense attorney represented MANUAL SANDOVAL with a receiving stolen property charge.Defendant appeals his conviction for receiving stolen property contrary to 19 NMSA 1978, Section 30-16-11 (2006). We issued a notice of proposed summary 20 disposition in this matter proposing to affi... More... $0 (05-23-2021 - NM) |
United States of America v. Bonifacio Lopez-Urgina |
Bonifacio Lopez-Urbina pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court followed the recommendation of the probation officer and departed two criminal history levels downward from the Unit... More... $0 (05-02-2019 - NM) |
United States of America v. Rogelio Gonsalez, a/k/a Nol, a/k/a Jose Luis Chavez, a/k/a Luis Acosta-Rivas, a/k/a Albert Aroolo-Estrada, a/k/a Norberto Escarcega Ramos |
Rogelio Gonsalez pleaded guilty to three counts of distributing methamphetamine. He was sentenced to 151 months’ imprisonment, which was at the low end of the Sentencing Guidelines range of 151 to 188 months. Although his plea agreement contained an appeal waiver, he... More... $0 (03-08-2019 - NM) |
Jesse Romero v. Titlemax of New Mexico, Inc. and TMX Finance, LLC; Tracy Young |
This is an interlocutory appeal from a partial denial of a motion to compel arbitration. Plaintiff-Appellee Jesse Romero filed a class action complaint in New Mexico state court against Defendants-Appellants TitleMax of New Mexico, Inc., TMX Finance LLC, and Tra... More... $0 (02-06-2019 - NM) |
United States of America v. Martin Saavedra-Villasenor
Morelaw Internet Marketing
888-354-4529 |
When he illegally reentered the United States after completing a prison term in |
Quentin Scott v. City of Albuquerque
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Courthouse - Denver, Colorado |
A New Mexico statute makes it illegal to “willfully interfere with the |
United States of America v. Matthew Yazzie |
In this direct criminal appeal, Defendant-Appellant Matthew Yazzie contends |
United States of America v. Alonzo Williamson |
Two months after his release from prison, Alonzo Williamson was accused |
Debra Hatten-Gonzales v. Brent Earnest |
New Mexico appeals the district court’s grant of Debra Hatten-Gonzales’s |
STATE OF NEW MEXICO v . TRUETT THOMAS |
On June 3, 2010, Guadalupe Ashford’s body was found partially hidden behind |
United States of America v. Carlos Franco |
Carlos Franco pleaded guilty to federal firearm charges under a plea |
United States v. Soto-Robledo |
Mr. Alejandro Soto-Robledo was convicted of illegal reentry into the |
United States of America v. Adrian Mike |
Defendant Adrian Mike appeals his conviction for escape in violation of 18 |
William B. Acheff v. United States of America |
After a bench trial, the district court found that Mr. Jon Edelman owed the |
United States of America v. Jerome Yazzie |
Jerome Yazzie appeals the 40-year sentence he received after being convicted by a jury of several offenses, including two counts of carrying or using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). On appeal he argues that the United States After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on... More... $0 (03-13-2014 - NM) |
Amethyst Land Co., Inc. v. James F. Terhune |
{1} Appellant Amethyst Land Co., Inc. (Amethyst) and Appellees James F. Terhune and Elizabeth R. Terhune (the Terhunes) are adjoining property owners in Santa Fe County, New Mexico. For several years, access to the property now owned by Amethyst was provided by a 40-foot, non-exclusive roadway and utility easement located on the land now owned by the Terhunes. In 2001, when the Terhunes purchased ... More... $0 (02-26-2013 - NM) |
United States of America v. Brad Ahrensfield |
Following a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of obstructing justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of six months and one day, followed by six months of home confinement and a term of supervised release. This appeal followed. |
ConocoPhillips Company v. Patrick H. Lyons |
{1} This litigation stems from a dispute over the proper calculation of royalty payments on state oil and gas leases. In New Mexico, the Commissioner of Public Lands (Commissioner) “is hereby authorized to execute and issue in the name of the state of New Mexico, as lessor, leases for the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas, from any lands belonging to the state of New... More... $0 (08-24-2012 - NM) |
Stuart T. Guttman, M.D. v. G.T.S. Khalsa |
The question presented in this appeal is whether the Eleventh Amendment protects New Mexico from a suit for money damages under Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131–65. We conclude it does. New Mexico has state sovereign immunity from a claim that it violated the ADA when it revoked the medical license of a physician whose practice the state claimed constit... More... $0 (01-11-2012 - NM) |
Village of Wagon Mound v. Mora Trust |
{1} For a period of at least sixty-five years the Santa Clara Spring (the Spring) has been the sole source of water for the Village of Wagon Mound (the Village), the Mora Trust (the Trust) properties, and the lands owned by Earl and Glenda Berlier and their Wagon Mound Ranch, L.L.C. (the Berliers). A dispute arose between the Village, the Trust, and the Berliers as to the ownership and use of, as ... More... $0 (12-18-2002 - NM) |
Jessica Cohon v. State of New Mexico |
Plaintiff-Appellant Jessica Cohon sought funding through New Mexico’s Mi Via Waiver program,1 a Medicaid program offered by New Mexico that offers a home and community-based alternative to institutional care for qualifying individuals. Cohon qualified for the Mi Via Waiver program and submitted budget requests which were granted in part and denied in part. She unsuccessfully filed an administrat... More... $0 (05-09-2011 - NM) |
Jesus Gonzalez v. Performance Painting, In.c |
{1} Worker Jesus Gonzalez appeals the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying him modifier benefits from his employer Performance Painting, Inc. (Employer) under NMSA 1978, Section 52-1-26(C) (1990), of the New Mexico Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -70 (1929, as amended through 2007). The WCJ denied modifier benefits because Worker’s undocume... More... $0 (01-10-2011 - NM) |
Lawrence Alba v. Lorna D. Hayden |
{1} This case involves a property ownership dispute. Defendant White’s ownership interest in the property arose from a quitclaim deed from Defendant Hayden, whose ownership interest arose out of a real estate contract between Hayden and Plaintiff, which Plaintiff contended was invalid. In Plaintiff’s action against Defendants, Hayden failed to answer requests for admissions, which resulted in ... More... $0 (03-23-2010 - NM) |
Village of Angel Fire v. Board of County Commissioners of Colfax County |
{1} This case results from the disintegration of an agreement between the Village of Angel Fire (Village) and the Board of County Commissioners of Colfax County (County). In 2001, the parties executed a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) in which the Village promised to collect the trash of certain county residents in consideration for the sum of $50,000, paid semi-annually in payments of $25,000 each. ... More... $0 (03-25-2010 - NM) |
Phillis Ideal v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company, L.P. |
{1} Plaintiffs-Respondents (Plaintiffs) are royalty owners who brought a class action lawsuit claiming that Defendant-Petitioner (Burlington) has underpaid royalties by improperly deducting the costs and expenses associated with placing natural gas in a marketable condition. The district court certified a class under Rule 1-023(B)(2) and (B)(3) NMRA, finding that “[t]he common pre-tailgate deduc... More... $0 (04-27-2010 - NM) |
Warren and Betty Beaver v. Michael and karen Brumlow |
{1} This case is about a verbal agreement made by Warren and Betty Beaver (Sellers) to sell land for a home site to Michael and Karen Brumlow (Buyers). Sellers reneged on the agreement after Mr. Brumlow left Sellers’ employment and started working for a competitor. The trial court ordered specific performance of the oral agreement, and Sellers appeal. Sellers acknowledge that the evidence was su... More... $0 (03-04-2010 - NM) |
Stella R. Kirby v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America |
{1} Wrongfully denied her disability benefits, a former employee obtained a judgment against her employer’s long-term disability plan based on rights accorded under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 to 1461 (2000). The employee seeks to enforce that judgment by way of a writ of garnishment against the insurer whose insurance policy funded th... More... $0 (03-04-2010 - NM) |
Mark A. Pallotino, Sr. v. City of Rio Rancho, et al. |
Mark A. Pallotino, Sr. and Mark S. Pallotino, Jr. appeal from the district court’s judgment entered in favor of defendants. Because the district court has not disposed of all of the federal claims presented by plaintiffs in their complaint, we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district court for further proceedings. |
Michael Montoya v. Rafaelita Medina a/k/a Rafaelita M. Medina and Trinidad V. Medina |
{1} “In a case tried by the court without a jury, . . . the court shall enter findings of fact and conclusions of law when a party makes a timely request.” Rule 1-052(A) NMRA. The reasons for this requirement are to aid “the appellate court by placing before it the basis of the decision of the trial court; to require care on the part of the trial judge in . . . consideration and adjudic... More... $0 (02-09-2009 - NM) |
Michael Montoya v. Rafaelita Median a/k/a Rafaelita M. Median and Trinidad V. Medina |
{1} “In a case tried by the court without a jury, . . . the court shall enter findings of fact and conclusions of law when a party makes a timely request.” Rule 1-052(A) NMRA. The reasons for this requirement are to aid “the appellate court by placing before it the basis of the decision of the trial court; to require care on the part of the trial judge in . . . consideration and adjudic... More... $0 (02-09-2009 - NM) |
Jamie Durham and Travis Durham v. Suzanne Guest |
{1} Plaintiffs Jamie Durham (Jamie) and Travis Durham (Travis) (together, the Durhams) sued Suzanne Guest (Guest) for malicious abuse of process, alleging that she issued subpoenas for an illegitimate purpose in an arbitration proceeding. Guest contends that the Durhams failed to state a malicious abuse of process claim under DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp., 1998-NMSC-001, 124 N.M. 512, ... More... $0 (02-20-2009 - NM) |
Jacek Rokowski v. Sharon Lynn Rokowski and Mark Alan Gilbert; Amy Evans Gilbert |
This appeal comes to us from an order of the district court dismissing Jacek Rokowski’s complaint based on various New Mexico domestic relations statutes and the Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-611, 94 Stat. 3568 (codified in part at 28 U.S.C. § 1738A). Mr. Rokowski’s claims arise from the termination of his parental rights as to his daughter (the Child) and the adop... More... $0 (03-13-2009 - NM) |
Suzanne Guest and The Guest Law Firm, P.C. v. David Berardinelli and Cheryl McLean |
{1} Plaintiffs, Suzanne Guest and the Guest Law Firm (Guest), appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants, David Berardinelli (Berardinelli) and Cheryl McLean (McLean) (collectively referred to as Defendants), on three claims: (1) malicious abuse of process, (2) interference with existing and prospective contractual relations, and (3) prima facie tort. Guest... More... $0 (02-29-2008 - NM) |
William Montano; Doris Lucero v. Christmas by Krebs Corporation |
Plaintiffs William Montano and Doris Lucero appeal the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of their former employer Christmas by Krebs Corp. (CBK). They claim that their employment was terminated in a reduction in force (RIF) in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1), and New Mexico state law. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ... More... $0 (09-19-2008 - NM) |
John and Joanne Sheldon v. The Hartford Insurance Company |
{1} John and Joanne Sheldon (collectively Appellants) appeal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment on their claims against The Hartford Insurance Company (Hartford) arising from an insurance coverage dispute. Appellants contend that Hartford was obligated to provide insurance coverage under the personal automobile policy of James Reynolds, Jr. (Reynolds), the driver of a 1997 Fo... More... $0 (06-16-2008 - NM) |
Robert Fiser v. Dell Computer Corporation a/k/a Dell, Inc. |
{1} We granted certiorari to review whether Defendant Dell Computer Corporation’s Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act was properly granted. We hold that, in the context of small consumer claims that would be prohibitively costly to bring on an individual basis, contractual prohibitions on class relief are contrary to New Mexico’s fundamental publi... More... $0 (07-30-2008 - NM) |
Concerned Residents of Santa Fe North, Inc. v. Santa Fe Estates, Inc. |
{1} The parties in this real estate development dispute are Concerned Residents of Santa Fe North, Inc. (Residents), Santa Fe Estates, Inc. (Estates), the City of Santa Fe (the City), and Thornburg Companies (Thornburg).
|
Alliance Health of Santa Teresa, Inc., etc. v. National Presto Industries, Inc. and The Araz Group |
|
Mary Salas v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company |
{1} Plaintiff Mary Salas filed a complaint for breach of contract after Mountain States Mutual refused to provide her underinsured motorist coverage under a policy Mountain States had issued to Plaintiff's son and daughter-in-law. Mountain States requested summary judgment arguing that Plaintiff had failed to comply with the consent-to-settle provisions of the policy. The district court ... More... $0 (12-24-2007 - NM) |
Mark Rendleman v. Donna Heinley |
{1} Plaintiff Mark Rendleman and Defendant Donna Heinley own separate properties having a common boundary. Plaintiff's property is north and Defendant's property is south of that common boundary. Plaintiff claims that Defendant trespassed across the common boundary and onto Plaintiff's property. He asserts that the district court erred in holding that Plaintiff failed to prove trespass. <... More... $0 (01-25-2007 - NM) |