|
|
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio - Criminal defense lawyer represented defendant with a possessing a firearm as a felon charge.Daniel Gissantaner became embroiled in an argument with his neighbors. One neighbor called 911, telling the dispatcher that Gissantaner, a convicted felon, had a gun. The police responded to the call and foun... More... $0 (01-07-2022 - OH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATE OF OHIO - vs - ANDRE R. WILLIAMS |
|
Warren, OH - Criminal defense attorney represented Andre R. Williams with a denyial of Williams’ petition for postconviction relief..{¶1} Andre R. Williams, an offender on Ohio’s death row, appeals from the April 11, 2019 judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, denying Williams’ petition for po... More... $0 (02-01-2021 - OH) |
|
STATE OF OHIO v. NORMUROD ROZIKOV |
|
Sandusky, OH - Criminal defense lawyer represented defendant Normurod Rozikov with appealing the judgment entry of sentence of the Upper Sandusky Municipal Courts jury verdict finding Rozikov guilty of vehicular homicide.{2} The facts relevant to this appeal are as follows. On July 1, 2017, Rozikov was making a ... More... $0 (12-05-2020 - OH) |
|
MICHAEL CHRISTMAN ET AL. v. CONDEVCO, INC. ET AL. |
|
MoreLaw ReceptionistsVOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services Appellants own 141.62 acres of land, including the oil, gas, and associated mineral rights loca... More... $0 (05-24-2020 - OH) |
|
State of Ohio v. Jeremay Marquis Jones |
|
MoreLaw Virtual ReceptionistsNo More Robo Calls With MoreLaw Receptionists ... More...
$0
(06-06-2019 - OH)
|
|
STATE OF OHIO v. DAVON M. IRVINE |
|
At approximately 4:30 a.m., the police responded to a dispatch for a burglary in progress at the home of two brothers. When they arrived, the police found the brothers bloodied and bruised, having been pistol-whipped and bound... More... $0 (03-23-2019 - OH) |
|
STATE OF OHIO v. PHILLIP JONES |
|
Jones was sentenced to death for the rape and murder of S.Y. The Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed Joness convictions and sentence of death in State v. Jones, 135 Ohio St.3d 10, 2012-Ohio-5677, 267 (Jones I). However, prior... More... $0 (02-02-2019 - OH) |
|
STATE OF OHIO vs. NATHAN FORD |
|
This case stems from three separate incidents, each involving a different victim, T.H., L.G., and S.G. In a 2005 case, Ford was convicted of multiple counts of rape, kidnapping, gross sexual imposition, felonious assault, and ... More... $0 (12-24-2018 - OH) |
|
STATE OF OHIO v. DOUGLAS PRADE
MORELAW Legal Services MarketingYour Source For Marketing Your Firm Nationwide . Completely Free Marketing If It Does Not Work. |
|
Almost twenty years ago, a jury convicted Mr. Prade for the aggravated murder of |
|
STATE OF OHIO - vs - MOHAMMED LAGHAOUI |
|
On July 5, 2016, the Warren County Grand Jury returned a multi-count |
|
STATE OF OHIO vs. DOUGLAS C. SHINE, JR. |
|
Appellant Douglas C. Shine, Jr. (appellant) appeals from his convictions for |
|
STATE OF OHIO vs. SHANNON L. HORSLEY JR |
|
Appellant was indicted on August 22, 2014 on five counts of |
|
STATE OF OHIO v. ERIC D. HENDON |
|
On December 31, 2013, an incident occurred involving a robbery at a house |
|
State of Ohio v. Douglas Shine, Jr.
|
|
Cleveland, OH - Defendant Convicted On Multiple Murder Charges |
|
Charles Clark v. W & M Kraft, Inc. | |
Plaintiffs Charles and Kelley Clark appeal a jury verdict in favor of defendants W & M Kraft (“Kraft”), DB Industries (“DBI”), Ingram Barge Company (“Ingram”), and Consolidated Grain and Barge Company (“CGB”). Kraft appeals the district court’s dismissal of its cross-claim against CGB with prejudice. We AFFIRM the verdict from the district court and REVERSE and REMAND the distric... More... $0 (02-27-2012 - OH) |
|
Brandy Andler v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. | |
Plaintiff-Appellant Brandy Andler appeals the district court’s decision to exclude the testimony of her expert witness regarding loss of future earning capacity in her personal injury lawsuit against Defendant-Appellee Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. (“Clear Channel”). Clear Channel cross-appeals the denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability. Because the... More... $0 (02-29-2012 - OH) |
|
Jonathan Hirsch v. Christopher Mann | |
Following a train crash that allegedly exposed a small town to cancer-causing agents, the Plaintiffs-Appellants sought damages on behalf of a putative class. The district court granted summary judgment for the train company, CSX Transportation (CSX), because the Plaintiffs had not established general or specific causation and, as a matter of law, any increased risk of cancer or other diseases was ... More... $0 (09-08-2011 - OH) |
|
Jeff Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Company | |
At issue in this case is the often-elusive line between admissible opinion and inadmissible speculation under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Several manufacturers of welding supplies appeal a $20.5 million jury verdict based on a doctor’s testimony that their products triggered “manganese-induced parkinsonism” ... More... $0 (09-08-2010 - OH) |
|
Barbara Rose v. Truck Centers, Inc. | |
Plaintiffs Barbara and Robert Rose appeal an order entered in this products liability action by the district court granting Defendant TRW Automotive, U.S., LLC’s motion for summary judgment based on the inadmissibility of Plaintiffs’ expert’s testimony. In granting summary judgment, the district court concluded that Plaintiffs’ expert was not a qualified expert under Federal Rule of Eviden... More... $0 (08-06-2010 - OH) |
|
Vita-Mix Corp. v. Basic Holding, Inc. | |
This case involves alleged infringement by Basic Holding (“Basic”) of a patent and alleged trademark held by Vita-Mix Corporation (“Vita-Mix”). The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio granted summary judgment of no direct infringement, no inducement of infringement, no contributory infringement, and no trademark infringement in favor of Basic. The court also gran... More... $0 (09-16-2009 - OH) |
|
Stephen Popovich, also known as Cleveland International Records, etc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. | |
A jury awarded Stephen Popovich over five million dollars on his claim that Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., breached its duty to affix Popovich's record company logo to four Meat Loaf albums. On appeal, Sony argues that the damages award was barred as a matter of law. Popovich cross-appeals claiming the district court improperly denied his motion for pre-judgment interest, improperly limite... More... $5057916 (11-26-2007 - OH) |
|
Hardyman v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co. | |
Plaintiff-Appellant Gary Hardyman filed suit against Defendant-Appellee Norfolk & Western Railway Company ("Norfolk")(1) pursuant to the Federal Employers Liability Act ("FELA"), alleging that as a result of Norfolk's negligence, he developed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ("CTS") during the course of his employment as a conductor and brakeman for Norfolk. After granting Norfolk's motion in limine to excl... More... $0 (03-13-2001 - OH) |