Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 02-27-2020
Case Style:
Case Number: 04-20-00105-CR
Judge: PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
Court: Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Plaintiff's Attorney: Joe D. Gonzales
Defendant's Attorney:
Need help finding a lawyer for representation for filing for petition of writ of mandamus in Texas?
Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.
Description:
MoreLaw Suites
Virtual Offices of Solo Practice Lawyer Starting at $200 a Month
Office With MoreLaw Suites and Reduce Your Overhead
918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he asserts the trial court has failed
to rule on several motions in his underlying criminal case. Relator is represented by trial counsel
below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498
(Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se
mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also
Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding).
Outcome: Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: