Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 03-18-2020
Case Style:
In Re: Joe Feijoo
Case Number: 08-19-00314-CR
Judge: YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ
Court: COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
Plaintiff's Attorney: Hon. Jaime E. Esparza
Defendant's Attorney:
Need help finding a lawyer for representation for alleging that the trial court had no jurisdiction to convict him of any criminal charges because an assistant district attorney had declined to prosecute him on another charge in 1991 in Texas?
Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.
Description:
MoreLaw Suites
Virtual Offices of Solo Practice Lawyers Starting at $200 a Month
Office With MoreLaw Suites and Reduce Your Overhead
918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com
MoreLaw Suites
Virtual Offices of Solo Practice Lawyers Starting at $200 a Month
Office With MoreLaw Suites and Reduce Your Overhead
918-582-3993 - Info@MoreLaw.com
Relator Joe Feijoo, a pro se inmate, has filed a mandamus petition against the 205th District
Court, alleging that the trial court had no jurisdiction to convict him of any criminal charges
because an assistant district attorney had declined to prosecute him on another charge in 1991.
The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
Generally, mandamus relief is appropriate only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or to
compel the performance of a ministerial duty, and where the relator has no adequate remedy by
appeal. In re Reece, 341 S.W.3d 360, 364 (Tex. 2011)(orig. proceeding). The burden is on relator
to show it is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Ford Motor Company, 165 S.W.3d 315, 317
(Tex. 2005)(orig. proceeding). After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude
that Relator has failed to show that he is entitled to mandamus relief.
Outcome: Accordingly, we deny thepetition for writ of mandamus.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: