Defendant's Attorney: Oklahoma City, Civil Rights violation claim defense lawyers represented the Defendants.

Description: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights violation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a sex discrimination theory.

During her time as a student in a chaplain residency program at OU Medicine, Inc., Plaintiff claims that she was subjected to racial and sexual discrimination, emotional distress, harassment, retaliation, and constructively discharged. (Doc. No. 24). Plaintiff alleges that Defendant UHA, a state agency, is liable to Plaintiff for: (1) deliberate indifference resulting in sexual harassment (strict liability, quid pro quo) in violation of Title IX (Doc. No. 24, at 20-24); (2) deliberate indifference resulting in sexual harassment and unwanted sexual contact in violation of Title IX (Id. at 24-27); (3) deliberate indifference resulting in sexual harassment (quid pro quo in violation of Title IX) (Id. at 27-30); (4) deliberate indifference resulting in a hostile environment in violation of Title IX (Id. at 30-33); (5) deliberate indifference resulting in sexual harassment in violation of Title IX (Id. at 33-35); (6) deliberate indifference resulting from a racially hostile educational environment in violation of Title VI (Id. at 35-38); and (7) discrimination based on sex, race, and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (Id. at 42-43). Plaintiff does not expressly assert any claims against Defendant Randy Dowell; he is only mentioned once in a one-sentence statement regarding his role as Chief Executive Officer of UHA responsible for carrying out UHA policies.

Outcome: STIPULATION of Dismissal By All Parties With Prejudice by Crystal Marie Daniels. (Mumina, Kwame) (Entered: 01/16/2024)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: