Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 09-13-2024
Case Style:
T.O. v. T.G.
Case Number: 2-23 CV -3283
Judge: Not Available
Court: Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, Ohio
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney:
Description:
Dayton, Ohio sexually oriented behavior family law lawyers represented the parties.
On June 23, 2023, T.O. filed a petition for a sexually oriented offense civil protection order pursuant to R.C. 2903.214. As part of her petition, T.O. requested an "ex parte (emergency) protection order." She further requested that a full hearing trial be scheduled, regardless of whether the ex parte protection order was granted or denied. At the conclusion of the ex parte hearing, the magistrate overruled the request for an ex parte civil protection order due to a lack of evidence showing a risk of imminent physical harm. A full hearing on the petition for a protection order was then scheduled.
Outcome: {ΒΆ 82} The judgment of the trial court will be reversed, and the cause will be remanded for the trial court to rule on Respondent's objections to the trial court's October 24, 2023 order.
T.O. v. T.G., 2024 Ohio 4510, 30058 (Ohio App. Sep 13, 2024)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: