Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 10-10-2024

Case Style:

State of Oklahoma v. Doyle D. Bertschy

Case Number: CF-2023-307

Judge: Halley

Court: District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Canadian County Oklahoma District Attorney's Office

Defendant's Attorney:


Click Here For The Best El Reno Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory



Description: El Reno, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: BRG2, BURGLARY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of 21 O.S. 1435
Date of Offense: 04/10/2023
BERTSCHY, DOYLE D
Disposed: CONVICTION, 10/09/2024. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: AMENDED TO MISDEMEANOR BREAKING AND ENTERING(ENTB)
Violation of 21 O.S. 1438

Outcome: 10-09-2024 CTFREE


CRT MIN. DEFT APPEARS BY VIDEO FROM THE CANADIAN COUNTY JAIL ALONG WITH HIS ATTY ZAC RAMSEY. THE STATE APPEARS THRU JAMIE JAGOSH. THE DEFT IS SWORN, TESTIMONY IS TAKEN. THE DEFT WAIVES COURT REPORTER FOR THIS PLEA AGREEMENT. THE DEFT TESTIFIED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD THE QUESTIONS ON THE SUMMARY OF FACTS AND THAT HIS ANSWERS WERE TRUTHFUL AND HONEST. HE FURTHER TESTIFIED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND THAT BY ENTERING A PLEA HE WOULD BE GIVING UP THOSE RIGHTS. THE STATE MOVES TO AMEND THE CHARGE IN CF-23-307 TO A MISDEMEANOR BREAKING AND ENTERING. WITH THAT THE PLEA AGREEMENT ON CF-23-354 COUNT 1 IS 5 YEARS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, $30.00 VCA. COUNT 2 IS 1 YEAR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, $30.00 VCA. ON CF-23-307 IT IS 1 YEAR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. $30.00 VCA ON CM-23-446 ONE YEAR IN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, $30.00 VCA. ALL CASES AND COUNTS ARE TO RUN CONCURRENT WITH EACH OTHER AND CONCURRENT TO ROGERS COUNTY CASE CF-18-290 AND KAY COUNTY CASE CF-09-178 AND CF-09-139. THE DEFT GIVEN CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED AND EARNED RETROACTIVE BACK TO MAY 8, 2024. THE DEFT UNDERSTOOD THE PLEA AGREEMENT IN EACH CASE AND PLED GUILTY TO EACH COUNT IN EACH CASE. THE COURT ACCEPTS THAT PLEA. THE DEFT NEEDED NO FURTHER EXPLANATION OF HIS RIGHTS TO APPEAL. WISHES TO GO BACK TO DOC AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE, COURT EXECUTES THE SUMMARY OF FACTS ALONG WITH THE DISCHARGE OF WRIT, THE RULE 8 HEARING, COST HEARING NOTICE FORM. JUDGE HALLEY

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: