Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 10-18-2024

Case Style:

Janalyn Conley v. SnapPays Mobile, Inc., d/b/a Papaya Payments

Case Number: 2:23-cv-09655

Judge: Stephen V. Wilson

Court: United States District Court for the Central District of California (Los Angeles County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Los Angeles Consumer Credit Lawyer Directory



Defendant's Attorney: Albert T. Liou

Description:


Los Angeles, California Fair Debt Collect Practice Act violation lawyer represented the Plaintiff.


The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that prohibits debt collectors from using unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices to collect consumer debts. The FDCPA went into effect in March 1978.
Here are some of the things the FDCPA prohibits:

Contacting debtors at odd hours
Repeatedly calling debtors on the phone
Threatening legal action that isn't actually planned
Telling others about a debtor's debts

Lying to debtors

Making debtors pay more than they owe
Threatening debtors with arrest, jail time, property liens, or wage garnishment

The FDCPA applies to debts incurred for personal, family, or household purposes, but not to business debts. It also doesn't generally apply to the original creditor or business the debt was owed to.
Debtors can request to stop debt collectors from calling their home phones by sending a letter to the debt collector. It's a good idea to send the letter by certified mail with a return receipt.

Outcome: 2 ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT SNAPPAYS MOBILE, INC. d/b/a PAPAYA PAYMENTS by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Upon review of the Parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant SnapPays Mobile, Inc. d/b/a Papaya Payments, and good cause appearing IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED. The above-entitled matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice against Defendants SnapPays Mobile, Inc. d/b/a Papaya Payments. RE: Stipulation to Dismiss Party, 51 . (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (aco) (Entered: 10/18/2024)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: