Defendant's Attorney: Not Available

Description: Concord, New Hampshire civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking an injunction against robocalls.


This case arises from robocalls made to New Hampshire voters before the primary election in January of 2024. The League of Women Voters of New Hampshire, the League of Women Voters of the United States, and three New Hampshire voters allege that, by creating and sending those calls, Steve Kramer, Lingo Telecom, LLC, Life Corporation, and Voice Broadcasting Corporation violated the Voting Rights Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and New Hampshire Elections Laws, NH RSA 664:14-a and 644:14-b.[1]The Coolidge-Reagan Foundation (“Foundation”) moves for leave to file a memorandum as amicus curiae in support of the defendants' pending motions to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims and a memorandum in response to the plaintiffs' objection to the report and recommendation denying a preliminary injunction. The plaintiffs object to allowing the Foundation to participate in the case as amicus curiae. The active defendants did not respond to the Foundation's motion.
League of Women Voters of N.H. v. Kramer, 24-cv-73-SM-TSM, Opinion 2024 DNH 092 (D. N.H. Oct 29, 2024)

Outcome: Motion granted.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: