Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 10-08-2009
Case Style: Clarks Summit v. Peter Amato and Michael Noto
Case Number:
Judge: Carmen Minora
Court: Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania
Plaintiff's Attorney: Patrick Lavelle, Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania
Defendant's Attorney:
Description: Peter Amato and Michael Noto sued Clarks Summit on an inverse condemnation theory claiming that defendant wrongfully damaged a 101-acre tract of land owned by him when it closed a 117-square foot section Grandview Avenue. Plaintiffs claimed that they were forced to make costly improvements to other roads and caused property values to fall.
The defenses asserted by Defendant are not available.
Outcome: Defendant's verdict for $2.3 million.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: