Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 10-09-2009
Case Style: ZF Meritor, L.L.C., et al. v. Eaton Corporation
Case Number: 1:06-cv-00623-SLR
Judge: Sue L. Robinson
Court: United States District Court for the District of Delaware
Plaintiff's Attorney: Chandra Joan Rudloff and Karen Sullivan, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Wilmington, Delaware and Lauren H. Barski, R. Bruce Holcomb, Peter J. Kadzik, Ann-Marie Luciano, Charles E. Luftig, Meredith Graham Robinson and Jennifer D. Hackett
Defendant's Attorney: Don Reid, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, Delaware and Veronica N. Berger, Erik T. Koons, William C. Lavery, Andrew D. Lazerow, Curtis J. LeGeyt, Joseph A. Ostoyich and Melissa Handrigan
Description: ArvinMeritor Inc. sued Eaton Corp. on an antitrust violation theory claiming that Defendant engaged in anticompetitive conduct in the sale and marketing of heavy-duty truck transmissions. Plaintiff claimed that Eaton's anticompetitive behavior forced it out of the Nafta line-haul transmission business and led to the demise of its venture with ZF Industries.
n 2005, Eaton won a ruling from the International Trade Commission that prohibited imports of transmissions for medium- and heavy-duty trucks made by Germany-based ZF Friedrichshafen, ArvinMeritor and their joint venture, ZF Meritor LLC, into the U.S. because of a patent infringement.
Eaton denied wrongdoing.
Outcome: Plaintiffs' verdict. Damages to be determined later.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: Edited and published by Kent Morlan