Date: 11-17-2014

Case Style: Cheryl Brown v. Frank Raphael

Case Number: CJ-2013-5117

Judge: Carlos Chappelle

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Jessika Tate

Defendant's Attorney: Tim Crow

Description: COMES NOW the Plaintiff, CHERYL BROWN, for her cause of action against the
Defendant, SAIVIAR RAPHAEL, alleges and states as follows, to-wit:
JURISDICTION :
I Plarntiff, CHERYL BROWN, (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “Plaintiff’), resides in Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
2. Defendant, SAMAR RAPHAEL, (hereinafter sometimes referred to as “Defendants”), resides in Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
3. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case pursuant to the Oklahoma Constitution, Art. 7, Sec. 7.
4. The amount in controversy exceeds $75,001.00, exclusive of interests, costs, and attorney’s fees.
FACTS
5. On May 01, 2013, plaintiff CHERYL BROWN exited highway 1-244 eastbound and was stopped at red light at the intersection of Sheridan road then the defendant SAMAR RAPHAEL failed to stop which caused the collision causing the plaintiff to be injured.
6. The direct and proximate cause of said collision was the negligence and want of care by said Defendant, SAMAR RAPHAEL, resulting in damages to the Plaintiff as is hereinafter set below.
COUNT I
Auto Ne&ipence
7. Plaintiff CHERYL BROWN realleges and restates each and every material allegation as contained in the facts common to all counts, and alleges and states in addition thereto as follows to-wit:
8. That as the direct and proximate result of the aforesaid negligence of the aforesaid Defendants, Plaintiff sustained painful injuries that required medical care and treatment, pain and suffering, out of pocket expenses, and other damages that Plaintiff has been damaged in excess of $10,001.00, for interest thereon, for costs herein expended, and such other and ifirther relief as the Court deems equitable and just.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintiff demands a Jury Trial, prays for judgment against the Defendant on Count I in excess of $75,001.00, for interest thereon, and for costs herein expended, and such other and further relief as the Court deems equitable and just.

Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: