Date: 07-31-2015

Case Style: Jerry Lee Turner v. J.R. Bray, Joseph Dingal and Strategic Investigations Group

Case Number: CJ-2015-262

Judge: Gary E. Miller

Court: District Court, Canadian County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Alex Bednar

Defendant's Attorney: Edward Saheb

Description: El Reno, OK - Jerry Lee Turner sued J.R. Bray, Joseph Dingal and Strategic Investigations Group claiming;

COMES NOW Plaintiff, per 12 OS. §1382, 1383, 1384.1, 1387, and 1388, and prays for an exparte emergency Temporary Restraining Order and/or injunction against Defendants, to halt ongoing violations of Statutes and Regulations due to irreparable harm; in the alternative, Plaintiff prays for injunction pending final adjudication, per 12 OS §1383 at the start of a case. Defendants are violating law by misrepresenting to the public that JR. Bray is a licensed armed private investigator (“P1”) in Oklahoma working for Mr. Dingal, by concealing Mr. Bray’s true employment and profit sharing agreement, by refusing to provide Plaintiff any work product or itemized statement after he paid Defendants over $12,000 over a year ago, by unlawfully providing legal advice and legal stratqgy, by refusing to provide a copy of Mr. Bray’s P1 license,’ and by currently threatening to sue Plaintiff for an alleged outstanding bill of $23,000, infer a/ia.
1. Mr. Bray has been portraying himself to Plaintiff as an armed licensed private investigator, working for Defendants Joe Dingal and Joe Dingal Investigations. When asked about their relationship, Mr. Dingal in the past twenty-four hours has refused to explain Mr. Bray’s relationship with his agency. Also, Mr. Bray appears to also be holding himself out as employed by Defendant Strategic Investigations Group as an armed private investigator, which, according to advertisements, is managed by a Martin Adams, and the president of which is Wayne Schwartz, who appears to be a licensed investigator. The law requires a minimum of 8 hours of continuing education. See 59 05 1750.3 Mr. Bray has refused to communicate whether he has complied with continuing training requirements under CLEET.
2. The law requires that any private investigator agency (such as Defendants Strategic Investigations Group and Joe Dingal Investigations) have a physical business address and phone number. Specifically OAC 390: 35-5-1 states unequivocally:
all private investigation agencies shall maintain a place of business within the State of Oklahoma, and shall maintain an operative telephone having a published listing, in the agency name, The agency must also provide proof of published phone number in a format spec jJied by C’LEET Every license issued under this chapter shall be posted conspicuously in the licensee’s principal place of business in this state. The phone number shall be on file with CLEET.
The executive officer, manager, or other person in charge of supervising private investigators in the performance of their duties shall be a licensed private investigator.
(emphasis added).
Mr. Bray, however, is the true owner/manager of Defendant Strategic Investigations group, as the number for that business is re-routed to his phone. See Exhibit 2 (calling the number advertised actually forwards the caller to Defendant J.R, Bray. It is highly doubtful that either Mr. Martin Adams or Mr. Wayne Schwartz are currently supervising Mr. Bray in any capacity. Mr. Bray’s ownership is further supported by his statements to the Plaintiff. Mr. Dingal’s business card indicates a P.O. Box in Oklahoma City (Exhibit 5), andnot a physical address.
3. Thus, Mr. Bray appears to be actively violating the law as it pertains to agency requirements regarding investigators, by using another person’s agency license. In this case, Mr. Bray has held himself out as working with Defendant Dingal, but his comments, as well as advertisements and internet sites viewed in preparation for this Motion show that Mr. Bray is nowhere on either Mr. Dingal’s website, nor on the website for the business he allegedly works for, but somehow controls. See www.sigoke.com, visited 5/3/2015. Defendants Dingal and Bray have provided misleading information to the Client Plaintiff in order to receive funds in excess of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000.00), and continue to refuse to explain the truth, resulting in continuing violation of OAC 390 35-15-8.
4. CLEET regulations require that an agency must have at minimum 100,000 dollars of bond or insurance, that specifically covers criminal acts, intentional torts, as well as unintentional harm to a Plaintiff See Exhibit I (most recent insurance requirements at CLEET). Defendants Bray, Dingal, Dingal Investigations, and Strategic Investigations Group, have categorically refused to provide a copy of the insurance and bond covering Mr. Dingal and Mr. Bray for the work they allegedly did for Plaintiff, and Mr. Bray has refused to provide his license, or the license for Strategic Investigations Group. Defendant Dingal has also refused.
5. It appears that Mr. Bray is portraying to the public (including Plaintiff) that he is currently operating an armed private investigator business, but he is doing so without proper registration and without proper insurance as required by CLEET and as required by the Oklahoma Legislature. See also OAC 390 35-1 1-3. Mr. Bray and Mr. Dingal have refused to provide proof of statutory compliance with this insurance/bond requirement.
6. Mr. Bray and Mr. Dingal have recently been “hotheaded” and extremely inappropriate regarding the Plaintiffs sister, who has a pending divorec action, as Mr. Bray has
been badmouthing her and her new attorney, and constantly telling Plaintiff and his sister that he has the best legal strategy for Plaintiffs sister and that Plaintiff and his sister should trust Mr. Bray in that regard, because “[Mr. Bray’s] wife is an attorney and he knows the law Mr. Dingal on this date has reiterated the same concerning statements for Plaintiff to leave his attorney and work solely with Defendants regarding legal issues. See Exhibit 4 (Text message from Defendant Dingal to Plaintiff on May 4, 2015, calling Plaintiffs attorney a “loser” and telling Plaintiff to leave his attorney, after undersigned counsel specifically directed Mr. Dingal on May 3, 2015 to cease and desist from directly contacting Plaintiff prospectively. The unauthorized practice of law, found at 5 OS §5.l, Rule 1,1 prohibits Mr. Bray and Mr. Dingal from giving legal advice and promising outcomes to clients.2 Defendants should in no fashion be charging any fee for the rendering of legal advice, as none of the Defendants are an attorney.
7. Oklahoma Law (59 OS 1750 et seq.) requires a psychological examination prior to a license being granted to a private investigator applicant. The law requires a Minnesota Multiphasic or equivalent test be performed by a psychologist, such that the health practitioner be able to nile out that the applicant is at risk of harm to himself or clients. OAC 390 35-15-6; see also OAC 390 35-5-2(b)(l) (applicant must bear cost). Due to the fact that Mr. Bray and Mr. Dingal and their businesses have violated the law (both statutes and regulations) and both demonstrated extreme hotheaded, uncontrollable urges to scream, raise their voice and belittle Plaintiff, his family, and his attorney, as well as their knowing, calculated violations of administrative and statutory law, Plaintiff requests that this Court require both Mr. Bray and Mr. Dingal to provide a satisfactory psychological examination as per CLEFT requirements, or be required to undergo one as a precondition of further work together, as per OAC: 390-35-15-9.
8. Before Mr. Bray is to be able to carry a firearm and as an armed licensed private investigator, the law requires him to undergo Phase IV firearms training at CLEET. OAC 390:
3 5-5-8. Plaintiff request that Mr. Bray also provide proof of completion of such training before continuing to portray himself to the public as an armed license private investigator.
9. The law requires that any change of name of a business be made known to CLEET within ten (10) days. OAC 390: 35-5-13. New employment is to be indicated to CLEET within five (5) days of such new employment. OAC 390: 35-1 1-12. Mr. Bray appears to have failed to notify the Council for Law Enforcement Training (CLEET) that he had changed his business (seen on Exhibit 2 as being in Moore, Oklahoma) to start working for Mr. Dingal in 2014 (in Edmond or Oklahoma City), and failed to inform CLEET of new employment, in violation of the law.
10. Plaintiff paid over twelve thousand dollars to Defendants over one year ago at a Whataburger in Canadian County for Mr. Bray to conduct work as a private investigator. At such meeting Defendant Bray was carrying a firearm, and reached for it when a local Canadian County law enforcement person came to the table and said hello to Plaintiff, who is a friend. (thus, Defendant Bray has always portrayed himself as an armed private investigator). Approximately two thousand dollars was given in cash, and the other ten thousand dollars was in a check made out from Plaintiff to Defendant Dingal, for Mr. Bray’s work. Defendants conveyed to Plaintiff that Mr. Bray worked for Mr. Dingal as a licensed private investigator, and that Mr. Bray carried a firearm. At no point did either Defendants Bray or Dingal indicate any limitations whatsoever of Mr. Bray. As such, Defendants committed fraud in inducing Plaintiff to pay them. Plaintiff never received a receipt, and understood that Mr. Bray’s work was to be
fully encompassed by the twelve thousand dollars. Defendant Bray failed to provide any work product to Plaintiff, in violation of OAC 390 35-15-8.
11. Defendant Dingal was asked on Sunday how much he charged for Mr. Bray’s work, and he refused to answer. The per hour billing on Mr. Dingal’s website indicates a $75 per hour charge. See Exhibit 3. Plaintiff has asked for and never been presented any work product nor any invoice. Defendant Dingal brazenly stated on Sunday May 3, 2015 that Plaintiff Mr. Turner “could have come down anytime and gotten a copy of an invoice or services,” and refuses to provide one to undersigned counsel. Failure to provide written reports/summaries of activities to clients, when requested, is yet another continuing violation of the law. OAC 390 35-
15-8. Plaintiff has requested work product and invoices for many months.
12. Mr. Bray in a March 31, 2015 conversation, indicated that he was still owed twenty-three thousand above and beyond the previous twelve thousand dollars received. That would mean that Mr. Bray had billed over thirty five thousand dollars at $75 per hour!! Meaning that Bray has alleged verbally that he has billed at least 467 hours !! Not only is this outrageous, but it appears that Defendants have simply converted Plaintiffs’ money without any explanation to Plaintiff. One rather disturbing development is that Mr. Bray has indicated to Plaintiffs sister that he planned to be paid the outstanding $23,000 from a contingency agreement with an another attorney regarding final payment from divorce matter! Title 5, not only prohibits Mr. Bray from the unauthorized practice of law, but also from entering into contingency fee agreements in divorce matters. Bray and Dingal appear to have conspired to take Plaintiff’s money under false pretenses, and craft a false bill for services, while relying on a divorce attorney to pay them from Plaintiff’s sister’s case, on some sort of contingency fee agreement.

Court Docket Entries:

Date Code Description Count Party Amount
05-06-2015 TEXT

CIVIL RELIEF MORE THAN $10,000 INITIAL FILING. // PETITION FILED

Document Available (#1029239109) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
1 TURNER, JERRY LEE
05-06-2015 INJUNCT

INJUNCTION / RESTRAINING ORDER

05-06-2015 DMFE

DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
$ 2.00
05-06-2015 PFE1

PETITION
$ 163.00
05-06-2015 PFE7

LAW LIBRARY FEE
$ 6.00
05-06-2015 OCISR

OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
$ 25.00
05-06-2015 CCADMIN02

COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $2 COLLECTIONS
$ 0.20
05-06-2015 OCJC

OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
$ 2.00
05-06-2015 OCASA

OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
$ 5.00
05-06-2015 CCADMIN04

COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
$ 0.50
05-06-2015 LTF

LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
$ 10.00
05-06-2015 SMF

SUMMONS FEE (CLERKS FEE) (4)
$ 20.00
05-06-2015 MO

MOTION FOR EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR INJUNCTION FILED

Document Available (#1029239105) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
TURNER, JERRY LEE
05-06-2015 O

ORDER FILED

Document Available (#1029239101) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
TURNER, JERRY LEE
05-06-2015 CTFREE

CRT MIN. THIS COMES ON TODAY UPON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. THE COURT AT THIS TIME DOES ISSUE A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, SETS THIS MATTER ON THIS COURT'S DOCKET FOR MAY 15 @ 10:30AM. MR. BEDNAR IS THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD. JUDGE GARY MILLER

05-06-2015 TEXT

OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE MILLER, GARY E. TO THIS CASE.

05-06-2015 ACCOUNT

RECEIPT # 2015-441076 ON 05/06/2015.
PAYOR:MAVERINE T TURNER FAMILY TRUST TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $233.70.
LINE ITEMS:
CJ-2015-272: $183.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES.
CJ-2015-272: $6.00 ON AC23 LAW LIBRARY FEE.
CJ-2015-272: $0.70 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND.
CJ-2015-272: $5.00 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES.
CJ-2015-272: $2.00 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND.
CJ-2015-272: $2.00 ON AC64 DISPUTE MEDIATION FEES.
CJ-2015-272: $25.00 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND.
CJ-2015-272: $10.00 ON AC81 LENGTHY TRIAL FUND.

05-15-2015 CRF

COURT REPORTER FEE-TRIAL ON MERITS
$ 20.00
05-15-2015 RESP

DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EMERGENCY RESTRAINING ORDER OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR INJUNCTION AND DEMAND FOR SURETY OF $2,000,000.00 IN THE ALTERNATIVE FILED

Document Available (#1029516046) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
05-15-2015 CTFREE

CRT MIN. THIS COMES ON TODAY UPON A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER HEARING. ALL PARTIES APPEAR THRU THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD. THE COURT REPORTER IS JULEE THUMMEL. THE COURT DOES PROCEED TO HEAR THIS MATTER. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE HEARING, THE DEFENDANTS, MR. BRAY AND MR. DINGAL, STIPULATE THEY WILL PROVIDE INVOICES AND WORK PRODUCT TO MR. TURNER BY THIS COMING MONDAY MORNING. IN ADDITION, THEY STIPULATE THEY WILL NOT SURVEIL OR HAVE ANY OTHER ACTIVITY IN REGARD TO MR. TURNER, HIS SISTER OR MR. TURNER'S ATTORNEY IN THIS CASE. THE COURT AT THIS TIME DOES DISSOLVE THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE PART THAT RESTRICTS ANY SURVEILLANCE OF THE PLAINTIFF. JUDGE GARY MILLER

05-15-2015 ACCOUNT

RECEIPT # 2015-441918 ON 05/15/2015.
PAYOR:BRAY, J R TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $20.00.
LINE ITEMS:
CJ-2015-272: $20.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES.

05-19-2015 MOSJE

MOTION TO SETTLE JOURNAL ENTRY FILED
*HRG: 06-19-2015 @ 9:00AM-JUDGE GARY E MILLER*

RUNNER TOOK COPY TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1029516199) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
05-19-2015 CER

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FILED

Document Available (#1029516195) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
05-21-2015 T

EXCERPT OF TRANSCRIPT RULING OF THE COURT HAD ON THE 15TH DAY OF MAY 2015 BEFORE THE HONORABLE GARY E MILLER DISTRICT JUDGE FILED

REPORTED BY JULEE THUMMEL CSR

Document Available at Court Clerk's Office

05-22-2015 CERTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED

Document Available (#1029516480) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
05-22-2015 NO

NOTICE OF ADDRESS CHANGE FILED

Document Available (#1029516476) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
05-29-2015 CERTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED

Document Available (#1029523527) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
TURNER, JERRY LEE
06-01-2015 AC/C

ANSWER DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIM FILED

Document Available (#1029523179) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
06-11-2015 CERTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED

Document Available (#1029525345) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
06-19-2015 APLI

APPLICATION FOR FEES COSTS AND LOSSES FILED
**ATTY TOOK COPY TO JUDGE**

Document Available (#1029528106) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
06-19-2015 CERTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT DINGALS FIRST REQUEST FOR INTERROGATORIES PRODUCTION AND ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF JERRY LEE TURNER FILED

Document Available (#1030045634) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
06-19-2015 JE

JOURNAL ENTRY FILED

Document Available (#1030045679) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
06-19-2015 CTFREE

CRT MIN. THIS COMES ON TODAY ON A MOTION TO SETTLE JOURNAL ENTRY. EDWARD SAHEB APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. MR. BEDNAR APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF. AT THIS TIME, THE COURT DOES APPROVE THE ORDER AS PROPOSED BY MR. SAHEB. JUDGE MILLER.

06-23-2015 AFD

AFFIDAVIT OF JOSEPH DINGAL FILED

Document Available (#1030045761) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
06-23-2015 CERTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS APPLICATION FOR FEES COSTS AND LOSSES AND JOURNAL ENTRY OF MAY 15, 2015 FILED

Document Available (#1030045534) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
06-26-2015 MODJ

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT FILED
*HRG: 07-31-2015 @ 9:00AM-JUDGE GARY E MILLER*

NO COPY FOR JUDGE

Document Available (#1030045525) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
07-07-2015 CER

CERTIFICATE OF ATTEMPTS AT PROVIDING ADDITIONAL NOTICE IN ADDITION TO MAILING TO MR BEDNAR FILED

Document Available (#1030036506) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
TURNER, JERRY LEE
07-17-2015 MOVAC

MOTION TO SET ASIDE JOURNAL ENTRY AND RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR FEES FILED
*HRG: 08-21-2015 @ 9:00AM-JUDGE GARY E MILLER*

COPY GIVEN TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030040967) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
$ 33.00
07-17-2015 OCISR

OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM REVOLVING FUND
$ 25.00
07-17-2015 CCADMIN02

COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON $2 COLLECTIONS
$ 0.20
07-17-2015 OCJC

OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
$ 2.00
07-17-2015 OCASA

OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
$ 5.00
07-17-2015 CCADMIN04

COURT CLERK ADMINISTRATIVE FEE ON COLLECTIONS
$ 0.50
07-17-2015 MOAW

MOTION TO WITHDRAW FARHAD SAHEB AND BROOKS RAY FOR VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 5 AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FILED
*HRG: 08-21-2015 @ 9:00AM-JUDGE GARY E MILLER*

CPOY GIVEN TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030040971) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
TURNER, JERRY LEE
07-17-2015 ADJUST

ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION
$ 1.65
07-17-2015 ACCOUNT

ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES REDUCED BY THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:
CJ-2015-272: AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND -$0.63
CJ-2015-272: AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND -$0.05
CJ-2015-272: AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES -$0.13
CJ-2015-272: AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND -$0.02
CJ-2015-272: AC01 CLERK FEES -$0.82

07-17-2015 ACCOUNT

RECEIPT # 2015-448446 ON 07/17/2015.
PAYOR:ALEXANDER L BEDNAR TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $65.70.
LINE ITEMS:
CJ-2015-272: $32.18 ON AC01 CLERK FEES.
CJ-2015-272: $1.65 ON AC09 CARD ALLOCATIONS.
CJ-2015-272: $0.68 ON AC31 COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND.
CJ-2015-272: $4.87 ON AC58 OKLAHOMA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES.
CJ-2015-272: $1.95 ON AC59 COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND.
CJ-2015-272: $24.37 ON AC79 OCIS REVOLVING FUND.

07-31-2015 O

ORDER FILED

Document Available (#1030403713) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
07-31-2015 MO

MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT PLEADINGS REGARDING COUNTERCLAIM AND NOTICE TO COURT THAT PLAINTIFF IF FILING SPECIAL APPEARANCE TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE FACT NO SUMONS WAS EVER ISSUED NO RETURN OF SERVICE EVER FILED MAKING THE COUNTERCLAIM A NULLITY AND PREVENTING ANY JUDGMENT THEREON FILED
*HRG: 08-28-2015 @ 9:00AM-JUDGE GARY E MILLER*

ATTY TOOK COPY TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030403857) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
TURNER, JERRY LEE
07-31-2015 EAA

SPECIAL ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND MOTION TO DISMIS DEFICIENT COUNTERCLAIM FOR LACK OF SUMMONS AND RETURN OF SERVICE FILED
*HRG: 08-28-2015 @ 9:00AM-JUDGE GARY E MILLER*

ATTY TOOK COPY TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030403853) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
TURNER, JERRY LEE
07-31-2015 APLI

APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY FOR GOOD CAUSE FILED
*HRG: 08-28-2015 @ 9:00AM-JUDGE GARY E MILLER*

ATTY TOOK COPY TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030403849) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
TURNER, JERRY LEE
07-31-2015 CTFREE

CRT MIN. THIS COMES ON TODAY UPON MOTION FOR DEFAULT ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT. THERE IS NO RESPONSE FROM THE PLAINTIFF AND THE COURT DEEMS THE MOTION CONFESSED. AN ORDER TO BE PREPARED. JUDGE MILLER

08-03-2015 RESP

DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SET ASIDE JOURNAL ENTRY FILED

COPY GIVEN TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030403738) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-03-2015 R

DEFENDANTS REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR FEES FILED

COPY GIVEN TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030403730) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-03-2015 CERTS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED

Document Available (#1030403734) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-04-2015 RESP

DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO WITHDRAW COUNSELS FILED

COPY GIVEN TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030399771) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-04-2015 MO

MOTION TO HAVE DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS DEEMED ADMITTED AS A MATTER OF LAW FILED
*HRG: 08-28-2015 @ 9:00AM-JUDGE GARY E MILLER*

COPY GIVEN TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030399767) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-04-2015 CER

CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY FILED

Document Available (#1030399763) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-04-2015 CER

CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY FILED

Document Available (#1030399759) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-10-2015 JE

JOURNAL ENTRY FILED

Document Available (#1030399209) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
DINGAL, JOSEPH
08-11-2015 CTFREE

CRT MIN. THIS COMES ON TODAY UPON DEFT JOSEPH DINGAL'S APPLICATION FOR FEES, COSTS AND LOSSES. MR. DINGAL DOES APPEAR W/HIS ATTORNEY OF RECORD EDWARD SAHEB. MR. BEDNAR ON BEHALF OF THE PLFT DOES NOT APPEAR. THE COURT DOES REVIEW THE APPLICATION, REVIEWS THE AFFIDAVIT OF MR. DINGAL; IN ADDITION THE COURT FURTHER FINDS THAT MR. BEDNAR'S RESPONSE IS TO SET ASIDE A JOURNAL ENTRY. COURT AT THIS TIME DOES GRANT THE REQUESTED RELIEF ALL AS PER ORDER. JUDGE MILLER.

08-14-2015 RESP

DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT PLEADING REGARDING A COUNTERCLAIM AND NOTICE TO COURT THAT PLAINTIFF IF FILING A SPECIAL APPEARANCE TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE FACT NO SUMMONS WAS EVER ISSUED NOT RETURN OF SERVICE EVER FILED MAKING THE COUNTERCLAIM A NULLITY AND PREVENTING ANY JUDGMENT THER ON FILED

COPY GIVEN TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030399701) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-14-2015 RESP

DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY FOR GOOD CAUSE FILED

COPY GIVEN TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030399697) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-14-2015 RESP

DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS SPECIAL ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND MOTION TO DISMISS DEFICIENT COUNTERCLAIM FOR LACK OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND RETURN OF SERVICE FILED

COPY GIVEN TO JUDGE

Document Available (#1030399693) Download document in TIFF format.TIFF Download document in PDF format.PDF
BRAY, J R
08-21-2015 CRF

COURT REPORTER FEE-TRIAL ON MERITS
$ 20.00
08-21-2015 ADJUST

ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO AC09-CARD ALLOCATION
$ 0.50
08-21-2015 ACCOUNT

ADJUSTING ENTRY: MONIES DUE TO THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES REDUCED BY THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:
CJ-2015-272: AC01 CLERK FEES -$0.50

08-21-2015 ACCOUNT

RECEIPT # 2015-452279 ON 08/21/2015.
PAYOR:FERN L EAVES TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $20.00.
LINE ITEMS:
CJ-2015-272: $19.50 ON AC01 CLERK FEES.
CJ-2015-272: $0.50 ON AC09 CARD ALLOCATIONS.

Outcome: On May 15, 2015, came on Show Cause Hearing on Plaintiff’s May 6, 2105 Ex-Parte Order had by Plaintiff against the Defendants pursuant to 12 O.S. §1382, 12 O.S. §1383, 12 O.S. §1384.1, 12 O.S. §1387, 12 O.S. §1388 as well as other applicable statutes. Plaintiff appeared in person and through counsel Alexander Bednar. Defendants J.R Bray and Strategic Investigation Group appeared in person and through their counsel Brooks T. Ray. Defendants Joseph Dingal and Joseph Dingal Investigation appeared in person and through their counsel Edward F. Saheb. The Court took notice of Defendant’s offer and consent to deliver work product and billing relating to this action to Plaintiff within 3 day without need for Plaintiffs use of Discovery process. This Court proceeded to hear Testimony of Plaintiffs and both Defendants. The Court took evidence, heard arguments offered by counsel, examined the Court’s file and exhibits provided by Parties and thereupon FOUND AS FOLLOWS:
That Order May 6, 2015, ought not to have been had.

Restraining order dissolved

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: