Date: 10-04-2016

Case Style:

Case Number: 05-16-01043-CV

Judge: David Bridges

Court: In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Andrew B. Sommerman

Defendant's Attorney:

*Christy Amuny*

*R. Brent Cooper*

Description: Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which it seeks relief from
an order compelling depositions. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need
not recount them herein.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly
abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co.,
148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we
conclude relator has not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a);
Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

Outcome:

Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and DENY relator’s motion to stay the depositions as moot.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:

View Case