Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 11-01-2023

Case Style:

United States of America v. Feast American Diners LLC and Dawood “David” Beshay

Case Number:

Judge: Not Assigned

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Albany County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office in Albany

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here For The Best Albany Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory

Description: Albany, New York qui tam lawyers represented restaurant own who violated the False Claims Act.

Feast American Diners LLC and Dawood “David” Beshay, the corporate owner and managing member of multiple Denny’s restaurants throughout Arizona and New York, including locations in Syracuse, Auburn, Camillus, Cicero, and Watertown, will pay $2 million to resolve allegations that Beshay falsely certified that Feast American Diners was eligible for a Restaurant Revitalization Fund (RRF) grant when he knew or should have known that his company owned and operated too many locations to qualify for the funding, announced United States Attorney Carla B. Freedman.

United States Attorney Freedman stated: “The Restaurant Revitalization Fund was meant to provide a financial lifeline to restaurants and other eligible entities that were struggling to stay afloat during the COVID-19 pandemic. Feast American Diners and Dawood Beshay are paying a steep price for falsely certifying their eligibility for these funds.”

Congress enacted the American Rescue Plan Act, in March 2021, as a continuation of the federal government’s efforts to provide relief to American individuals and businesses suffering the economic and public health effects of the pandemic. The Act allocated $28.6 billion toward an RRF, to be administered by the United States Small Business Administration (SBA), that could grant qualifying restaurants and other “eligible entities” monetary awards equal to revenue losses caused by the pandemic. Any restaurant that owned or operated more than 20 locations as of March 13, 2020 was not eligible for an RRF grant.

In April 2021, SBA released guidelines for completing RRF applications. The guidance reiterated that an entity was not an “eligible entity” if it owned or operated more than 20 locations as of March 13, 2020. At various points throughout the guidance, SBA explained that a restaurant was in “operation” if it was “making sales.”

In the settlement agreement, Feast American Diners and Beshay admit, acknowledge, and accept responsibility for the following facts: In May 2021, Beshay applied for an RRF grant on behalf of Feast American Diners, in the amount of $928,554. One of the questions on the application asked whether Feast American Diners owned or operated more than 20 locations as of March 13, 2020, to which Feast American Diners responded “no.” That same question indicated that an applicant who responded “yes” would not be eligible for the grant. Later in the application, Beshay affixed his initials next to the following statement: “The Applicant, together with its affiliates, does not own or operate more than 20 locations.” In fact, Feast American Diners owned 21 Denny’s locations as of March 13, 2020 and each of those locations made sales that day, facts that Beshay acknowledges that he should have known.

“Those who provide false information for the purpose of receiving and retaining SBA program funds meant for eligible small businesses will be held accountable,” said SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG) Eastern Region Special Agent in Charge Amaleka McCall-Brathwaite. “Today’s settlement sends a strong message that those responsible will be brought to justice. I want to thank the U.S. Department of Justice and our law enforcement partners for their dedication and pursuit of justice.”

The investigation began in December 2022, when a whistleblower filed a qui tam complaint under seal in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. When a whistleblower, or “relator,” files a qui tam complaint, the False Claims Act requires the United States to investigate the allegations and elect whether to intervene and take over the action or to decline to intervene and allow the relator to go forward with the litigation on behalf of the United States. The relator is generally able to then share in any recovery. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the relator will receive $200,000 of the settlement.

The investigation and settlement were the result of a coordinated effort between the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of New York, SBA-OIG, and SBA’s Office of General Counsel. The United States was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Adam J. Katz.

Outcome: Defendant agreed to pay $2 million to settle the claims made against them.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case