Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 12-01-2022

Case Style:

Roger Eugene Fain v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 02-21-00123-CR

Judge: Per Curiam


Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

On appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Tarrant County

Plaintiff's Attorney: Joseph W. Spence

Defendant's Attorney: Fort Worth, Texas - Best Criminal_Defens eLawyer Directory

Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.

Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement

MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.

MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge - 855-853-4800


Fort Worth, Texas – Criminal Defense lawyer represented Appellant with appealing the trial court’s order denying his motion to compare unidentified DNA profiles.

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as
counsel and a brief in support of that motion, in which counsel has determined, after
examining the appellate record, that no arguable grounds for appeal exist. See Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744–45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Counsel’s brief and
motion meet Anders’s requirements, presenting a professional evaluation of the entire
record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. Id., 87 S. Ct. at
1400. Although provided the opportunity to seek a copy of the appellate record and
to file a pro se response, appellant has not done so. Likewise, the State did not
respond to the Anders brief.
After carefully reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree with counsel
that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d
503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (noting reviewing court’s duty to make independent
determination after reviewing record); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S.
Ct. 346, 351 (1988). Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable
grounds for appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App.
2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Outcome: We therefore grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s order
denying appellant relief.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case