On appeal from The ">

Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 01-13-2022

Case Style:

David Librace v. Social Security Administration

Case Number: 17-2249

Judge: Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM


On appeal from The

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:

St. Louis, MO - Best Disability Lawyer Directory

Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.

Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement


MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.
MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge

Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800


St. Louis, MO - Disability lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant for wrongful denial of disability insurance benefits.

The only orders properly before this Court on appeal
are the orders granting the Commissioner’s motion for relief filed under Rule 60(a)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and denying Librace’s motion to alter or
amend filed under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We conclude
that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in making those rulings. See Keller
v. City of Fremont, 719 F.3d 932, 946 (8th Cir. 2013) (reviewing the district court’s
ruling on a Rule 60(a) motion for an abuse of discretion); Sipp v. Astrue, 641 F.3d
975, 981 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing the district court’s ruling on a Rule 59(e) motion
for an abuse of discretion).

Outcome: We affirm the judgment of the district court.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case