Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 01-13-2022
Case Style:
David Librace v. Social Security Administration
Case Number: 17-2249
Judge: Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM
Court:
On appeal from The
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Tell MoreLaw About Your Litigation Successes and MoreLaw Will Tell the World.
Re: MoreLaw National Jury Verdict and Settlement
Counselor:
MoreLaw collects and publishes civil and criminal litigation information from the state and federal courts nationwide. Publication is free and access to the information is free to the public.
MoreLaw will publish litigation reports submitted by you free of charge
Info@MoreLaw.com - 855-853-4800
Description:
St. Louis, MO - Disability lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant for wrongful denial of disability insurance benefits.
The only orders properly before this Court on appeal
are the orders granting the Commissioner’s motion for relief filed under Rule 60(a)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and denying Librace’s motion to alter or
amend filed under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We conclude
that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in making those rulings. See Keller
v. City of Fremont, 719 F.3d 932, 946 (8th Cir. 2013) (reviewing the district court’s
ruling on a Rule 60(a) motion for an abuse of discretion); Sipp v. Astrue, 641 F.3d
975, 981 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing the district court’s ruling on a Rule 59(e) motion
for an abuse of discretion).
Outcome: We affirm the judgment of the district court.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: