Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 02-09-2021

Case Style:

United States of America v. Rogelio Benavides

Case Number: 1:20-cr-00100-DAD

Judge: Dale A. Drozd

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (Fresno County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:


Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


Description: Fresno, California identity theft criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Rogelio Benavides, age 35, of Arvin, who was with bank fraud, aggravated identity theft, and being a felon in possession of a firearm.



Benavides pleaded guilty on Nov. 12, 2020. According to court documents, between November 2018 and September 2019, Benavides obtained hundreds of pieces of stolen mail that included checks, checkbooks, and personally identifiable information belonging to other individuals and businesses. He then altered and forged checks and either cashed or deposited the checks into his own bank accounts. He used personally identifiable information to apply for credit cards, which he used to make purchases and cash advances. He accessed bank accounts belonging to the other individuals and businesses and made payments for credit cards, loans, and insurance policies in his own name and the names of his associates. Benavides’ scheme caused more than $95,000 in fraudulent charges to be made to other individuals’ bank accounts and credit cards.

During the scheme, Benavides was found to have possessed a Glock Model 19, 9 mm pistol, which was illegal given his prior felony convictions.

This case was the product of an investigation by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Vincente Tennerelli and Joseph Barton are prosecuting the case.

18 USC 922(g)(1) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm
(1)

18 USC 1344 - Bank Fraud
(10)

18 USC 1028(A) - Aggravated ID Theft
(17)

Outcome: Defendant was sentenced to 5 years in prison and was also ordered to pay over $20,000 in restitution and forfeit another $20,000 as part of his sentence.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: