Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 08-04-2021
Case Style:
Case Number: 1:20-cv-06321-FB-RER
Judge: Frederic Block
Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Kings County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: Steven G. Mintz and Kevin Michael Brown
Description: Brooklyn, New York civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on n Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.
42 U.S.C. 12101 provides:
"The Congress finds that—
(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person's right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental disabilities have been precluded from doing so because of discrimination; others who have a record of a disability or are regarded as having a disability also have been subjected to discrimination;
(2) historically, society has tended to isolate and segregate individuals with disabilities, and, despite some improvements, such forms of discrimination against individuals with disabilities continue to be a serious and pervasive social problem;
(3) discrimination against individuals with disabilities persists in such critical areas as employment, housing, public accommodations, education, transportation, communication, recreation, institutionalization, health services, voting, and access to public services;
(4) unlike individuals who have experienced discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, or age, individuals who have experienced discrimination on the basis of disability have often had no legal recourse to redress such discrimination;
(5) individuals with disabilities continually encounter various forms of discrimination, including outright intentional exclusion, the discriminatory effects of architectural, transportation, and communication barriers, overprotective rules and policies, failure to make modifications to existing facilities and practices, exclusionary qualification standards and criteria, segregation, and relegation to lesser services, programs, activities, benefits, jobs, or other opportunities;
(6) census data, national polls, and other studies have documented that people with disabilities, as a group, occupy an inferior status in our society, and are severely disadvantaged socially, vocationally, economically, and educationally;
(7) the Nation's proper goals regarding individuals with disabilities are to assure equality of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for such individuals; and
(8) the continuing existence of unfair and unnecessary discrimination and prejudice denies people with disabilities the opportunity to compete on an equal basis and to pursue those opportunities for which our free society is justifiably famous, and costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity."
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and access to state and local government’ programs and services. As it relates to employment, Title I of the ADA protects the rights of both employees and job seekers. The ADA also establishes requirements for telecommunications relay services. Title IV, which is regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), also requires closed captioning of federally funded public service announcements.
Outcome: 08/04/2021 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jay Winegard (Segal, Mitchell) (Entered: 08/04/2021)
08/04/2021 ELECTRONIC ORDER DISMISSING CASE: See entry 11 . Ordered by Judge Frederic Block on 8/4/2021. (Innelli, Michael) (Entered: 08/04/2021)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: