Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 07-28-2023
Case Style:
Case Number: 1:23-cv-20458
Judge: Kathleen M. Williams
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Miami-Dade County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Stephen Jessup
Defendant's Attorney: William Jeremiah Tolton, III
Description: Miami, Florida labor and employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a wrongful denial of E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits.
"The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans. ERISA does not require employers to offer retirement or health plans, but if they do, the plans must meet certain standards.
ERISA's main provisions include:
Information and disclosure: ERISA requires plans to provide participants with information about the plan, including its features, funding, and investment options.
Fiduciary duties: ERISA imposes fiduciary duties on those who manage and control plan assets. These duties require fiduciaries to act prudently and in the best interests of plan participants.
Plan administration: ERISA sets standards for the administration of plans, including the establishment of grievance and appeals procedures.
Enforcement: ERISA provides for the enforcement of its provisions through the Department of Labor and the courts.
ERISA has been credited with helping to protect the retirement savings of millions of Americans. However, some critics argue that ERISA does not go far enough to protect participants from unscrupulous plan administrators.
Here are some of the benefits of ERISA:
Protects retirement savings: ERISA helps to protect retirement savings by requiring plans to be well-funded and by imposing fiduciary duties on those who manage and control plan assets.
Provides information and disclosure: ERISA requires plans to provide participants with information about the plan, including its features, funding, and investment options. This information can help participants make informed decisions about their retirement savings.
Establishes grievance and appeals procedures: ERISA establishes grievance and appeals procedures that participants can use to challenge plan decisions. This helps to ensure that participants are treated fairly under the plan.
Provides for enforcement: ERISA provides for the enforcement of its provisions through the Department of Labor and the courts. This means that participants have recourse if they believe that their rights have been violated.
Here are some of the disadvantages of ERISA:
Complex and lengthy legal process: The enforcement process under ERISA can be complex and lengthy. This can make it difficult for participants to get their benefits if they have been denied.
Lack of a jury trial: ERISA participants do not have the right to a jury trial in most cases. This means that they must rely on the courts to decide their cases, which can be a disadvantage.
ERISA preemption: ERISA preempts state laws that regulate employee benefit plans. This means that state laws that are more protective of participants than ERISA may not be enforced.
Overall, ERISA is a complex law with both benefits and disadvantages. However, it has played an important role in protecting the retirement savings of millions of Americans." Google Bard
Outcome: 07/28/2023 16 PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the notice indicating that the Parties have reached a settlement. (DE 15 .) Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before August 25, 2023, the Parties shall file a joint stipulation of dismissal. If the Parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction beyond the filing of their joint stipulation, they are advised that they must file the settlement agreement for review and any stipulation must comply with the Eleventh Circuit's holding in Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2012). Otherwise, the dismissal of this matter is effective and self-executing upon the filing of the Parties' joint stipulation of dismissal. Id. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. All hearings, trial settings, and deadlines are CANCELED. This case is CLOSED for administrative purposes. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 7/28/2023. (er01) (Entered: 07/28/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: