Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 12-02-2021
Case Style:
United States of America v. Shapat Nabaya
Case Number: 21-7158
Judge: Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Court:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
On appeal from The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond
Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Description:
Richmond, VA - Criminal defense lawyer represented defendant with a retaliation Against Federal Officer. charge.
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying 12
motions in his ongoing 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541,
545-46 (1949). The order Nabaya seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Nabaya’s motions to correct his
sentence and for immediate release, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
also deny Nabaya’s motion and supplemental motion to amend his certificate of interested
persons
Outcome: We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: