Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 03-07-2025

Case Style:

Reed Day, et al. v. Ben Henry, et al.

Case Number: 21-CV-1332

Judge: G. Murray Snow

Court: United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Maricopa County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Phoenix Civil Rights Lawyer Directory



Defendant's Attorney: Luci D. Davis (argued) and Nathan T. Arrowsmith,
Attorneys; Dena R. Benjamin and Linda Bergevin, Assistant Attorneys General; Kristen K. Mayes, Arizona Attorney General; Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, Arizona; for Defendants-Appellees.

Description: Phoenix, Arizona civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who wamted to buy wine online.

Plaintiff-Appellants Reed Day and Albert Jacobs are Arizona residents who desire to ship wine directly to
themselves from retailers who do not maintain in-state premises in Arizona. Arizona’s statutory scheme, however,
prevents such shipments. As a result, Plaintiffs brought a civil rights action against various Arizona state officials
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging the statutory scheme, which they claim violates the Commerce Clause.


MoreLaw

was created to help people find the right lawyers to represent them based on the performance history of trial lawyers in every county of the United States. Click the link above to see a list of the lawyers that MoreLaw has identified who practice law where this case was litigated.
Kent Morlan, Esq.

Outcome: Summary judgment in favor of the Defendants.

Affirmed

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher