Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 01-29-2025
Case Style:
Case Number: 21-CV-263
Judge: JB
Court: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (Bernalillo County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: New Mexico Attorney General's Office
Description: Albuquerque, New Mexico civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a breach of contract claim.
Dr. Ronald Howes is clinical psychologist who contracts with hospitals around the nation
through [a] placement firm, Ap.Contractor.com.” App. at 11. In turn, AP-Contractor.com
relies on another firm, Locumtenens,2 to provide “support and placement services” for the
medical professionals it places at hospitals around the country. Supp. App. Vol. I at 12.
Locumtenens entered into a contract (the “Services Contract”) with Defendant New
Mexico Department of Health (“NMDOH”) for Dr. Howes to work at the New Mexico
Behavioral Health Institute (“NMBHI”), starting in May 2020. The Services Contract
was a “standard contract issued by [NMDOH] for services, and gave [NMDOH] rights to
unilaterally terminate this contract while requiring [Locumtenens] to give 30 days’ notice
and an opportunity to cure.” App. at 12. Dr. Howes claims he was a third-party
beneficiary of the Services Contract.
* * *
In New Mexico, the general rule is that “one who is not a party to a contract
cannot maintain suit upon it.” Great Am. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. W. States Fire Prot. Co., 730
F. Supp. 2d 1308, 1316 (D.N.M. 2009) (quoting Fleet Mortg. Corp. v. Schuster, 811 P.2d
81, 82 (N.M. 1991)). However, “[a] third party may be a beneficiary of such contract, and
as a beneficiary may have an enforceable right against a party to a contract.” Fleet Mortg.
Corp., 811 P.2d at 82; Callahan v. N.M. Fed’n of Tchrs.-TVI, 131 P.3d 51, 58 (N.M.
2006) (“A third-party may have an enforceable right against an actual party to a contract
if the third-party is a beneficiary of the contract.”). “A third-party is a beneficiary if the
actual parties to the contract intended to benefit the third-party.” Callahan, 131 P.3d at
58. Otherwise, the individual is an “incidental beneficiary,” which is “a person who is
neither the promisee of a contract nor the party to whom performance is to be rendered
[but who] will derive a benefit from its performance.” Fleet Mortg. Corp., 811 P.2d at 83
(alteration in original) (citation omitted).
Outcome: Affirmed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: