Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 07-18-2022

Case Style:

Markie Lloyd and Natalia Shaw v., Inc.

Case Number: 2:18-cv-00955

Judge: Daphe A. Oberg

Court: United States District Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Salt Lake City Civil Rights Lawyer Directory

If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.

Defendant's Attorney: P. Corper James, II, William G. Gilchrist and Brooke A. White

Description: Salt Lake City, Utah civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on job discrimination theories under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Plaintiffs Markie Lloyd and Natalia Shaw brought this action against their former employer,, Inc. (“Overstock”), alleging disability discrimination and retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq. Plaintiffs claim they were wrongfully terminated because of their disabilities and in retaliation for protected activity under the ADA.

Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action.” Fed.R.Evid. 401. Irrelevant evidence is inadmissible. Fed.R.Evid. 402. Even if relevant, “[t]he court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of . . . unfair prejudice.” Fed.R.Evid. 403. Additionally, “[a] witness may testify to a matter only if evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 602

Outcome: Defendant's motion granted in part and denied in part.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case