Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 02-23-2023

Case Style:

Catherine Mann Seiple v. Fidelity National Title, LLC, et al.

Case Number: 2:21-CV-615

Judge: John L. Badalamenti

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Lee County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:







Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan


Click Here For The Best Fort Myers Civil Rights Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.



Defendant's Attorney: Christopher Cavaliere

Description: Fort Meyers, Florida civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a job discrimination (age) theory.





Federal Courthouse - For Myers


Federal Courthouse - Fort Myers, Florida


MoreLaw Legal News For Fort Myers





The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

(a) The Congress hereby finds and declares that—
(1) in the face of rising productivity and affluence, older workers find themselves disadvantaged in their efforts to retain employment, and especially to regain employment when displaced from jobs;
(2) the setting of arbitrary age limits regardless of potential for job performance has become a common practice, and certain otherwise desirable practices may work to the disadvantage of older persons;
(3) the incidence of unemployment, especially long-term unemployment with resultant deterioration of skill, morale, and employer acceptability is, relative to the younger ages, high among older workers; their numbers are great and growing; and their employment problems grave;
(4) the existence in industries affecting commerce, of arbitrary discrimination in employment because of age, burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce.
(b) It is therefore the purpose of this chapter to promote employment of older persons based on their ability rather than age; to prohibit arbitrary age discrimination in employment; to help employers and workers find ways of meeting problems arising from the impact of age on employment.

Outcome: The parties have filed a Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. (Doc. 33). The Stipulation is self-executing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Anago Franchising, Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate any pending deadlines and motions and close the file. Signed by Judge John L. Badalamenti on 2/23/2023. (WJF) (Entered: 02/23/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: