Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 07-13-2023

Case Style:

Camille W. Oubre v. Nghana Lewis, et al.

Case Number: 2:22-cv-01789

Judge: Nannette Jolivette Brown

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (Orleans Parish)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Thomas Joseph Hogan , Jr.

Defendant's Attorney: Marc Damon Moroux, Kim M. Boyle, Clerc Cooper, Debra J. Fischman, Hannah Lampo Brewton ,
James M. Garner and Jacquelyn Leslie Duhon for Lewis

Renee Gluth Culotta and Brady McNeil Hadden for40th Judicial District Court

Samuel J. Accardo , Jr. forSt. John the Baptist Parish Council

Description: New Orleans, Louisiana employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Dfendants on Family Medical Leave Act theories.

The FMLA entitles eligible employees of covered employers to take unpaid, job-protected leave for specified family and medical reasons with continuation of group health insurance coverage under the same terms and conditions as if the employee had not taken leave. Eligible employees are entitled to:

Twelve workweeks of leave in a 12-month period for:
the birth of a child and to care for the newborn child within one year of birth;
the placement with the employee of a child for adoption or foster care and to care for the newly placed child within one year of placement;
to care for the employee’s spouse, child, or parent who has a serious health condition;
a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform the essential functions of his or her job;
any qualifying exigency arising out of the fact that the employee’s spouse, son, daughter, or parent is a covered military member on “covered active duty;” or
Twenty-six work weeks of leave during a single 12-month period to care for a covered servicemember with a serious injury or illness if the eligible employee is the servicemember’s spouse, son, daughter, parent, or next of kin (military caregiver leave).

United States Department of Labor

Outcome: 07/13/2023 60 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: The Court having been advised that the parties have firmly agreed upon a compromise, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be and is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within sixty days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on July 13, 2023.(mp) (Entered: 07/13/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case