Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 03-18-2024

Case Style:

Celia Da Silva, et al. v. Lyft Incorporated, et al.

Case Number: 2:23-cv-01490

Judge: John J. Tuchi

Court: United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Maricopa County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Michael P. Grubbs and Nathaniel B. Preston - 602-649-6486

Defendant's Attorney: Phoenix, Arizona insurance defense lawyer represented the Defendant.

Description: Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case as filed in the Maricopa County Superior Court, CV2023-008744, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Arizona operates under a “comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they must take care of the resulting damages. In other words, liability for the crash falls on whoever caused it. But in some cases, it's not only one person's fault, but both to varying degrees.

Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: