Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 09-16-2021

Case Style:

United States of America v. Wayne H. Kruger

Case Number: 3:19-cr-30045-RM-TSH

Judge: Richard Mills

Court: United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois (Sangamon County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:


Best Springfield Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


Description: Springfield, IL: Criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with bank fraud.

Wayne H. Kruger, 73, of Litchfield, Illinois, was charged for defrauding several banks in Central Illinois.

Kruger pleaded guilty to three counts of bank fraud on February 22, 2021. According to court documents, Kruger admitted that beginning in December 2010 and continuing through about May 2012, he attempted to execute or executed schemes to defraud banks including the Carlinville, Illinois, National Bank and Trust Company; the State Bank of Cerro Gordo, Illinois; and the State Bank of Bement, Illinois, resulting in a total loss of $4,185,957. Kruger, then the president and owner of Ponder Equipment Company, Inc., a bus dealer, regularly sold buses “out of trust.” This fraudulent practice involves a dealership – here, Ponder – selling a bus that has been paid for with loan proceeds but failing to use the sale proceeds to pay back the lender. When Kruger sold a bus and failed to repay the associated loan, the relevant bank was unable to seize the loan collateral because it no longer existed as an asset of the business.

At the sentencing hearing, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Mills noted that Kruger’s scheme affected small banks in communities built on personal relationships and trust. The judge also ordered restitution for all three banks in the amount of $4,185,957.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of Inspector General investigated the case. Assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy A. Bass represented the government in the prosecution.

18:1344A.F: BANK FRAUD - On or about January 3, 2012 the Defendant knowingly executed bank fraud in violation of 18:1344.
(1)

18:1344A.F: BANK FRAUD - On or about January 31, 2012 the Defendant knowingly executed bank fraud in violation of 18:1344.
(2)

18:1344A.F: BANK FRAUD - On or about December 2, 2011 the Defendant knowingly executed bank fraud in violation of 18:1344.
(3)

Outcome: Defendant committed to the Bureau of Prisons for a term of 36 months, concurrent with Counts 2 and 3, 4 years supervised release with conditions and concurrent with Counts 2 and 3, a $100 special assessment and restitution. No fine imposed.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: