Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 09-15-2021

Case Style:

Angelo Reynolds v. C.R. Bard, Incorporated

Case Number: 3:19-cv-00762-wmc

Judge: William M. Conley

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (Dane County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Best Madison Product Liability Lawyer Directory

Defendant's Attorney: Catherine A. Faught, Catherine Helm, Mark R Nash, Richard B. North , Jr., Travis Evan Romero-Boeck

Description: Madison, WI: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous

C. R. Bard, Inc., now branded as Bard, headquartered in Murray Hill, New Jersey, USA, was a developer, manufacturer, and marketer of medical technologies in the fields of vascular, urology, oncology, and surgical specialties before its acquisition by BD.

Outcome: 09/15/2021 84 ORDER Granting 32 Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and C R Bard Incorporated. Defendants' motion to strike opinions and testimony from Michael Freeman, M.D., as generic and non-case specific (dkt. # 49 ) is Granted. Defendants' motion to exclude opinions and testimony of Michael Freeman, M.D., as untimely (dkt. # 47 ) is Denied as Moot.Defendants' motion to exclude opinions and testimony of Darren Hurst, M.D. and Derek D. Muehrcke, M.D. (dkt. # 44 ) is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/15/2021. (voc) (Entered: 09/15/2021)
09/15/2021 85 JUDGMENT entered in favor of Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and C R Bard Incorporated dismissing the case. (voc) (Entered: 09/15/2021)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case