Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 07-05-2022

Case Style:

Janes Doe v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., et al.

Case Number: 3:21-cv-140

Judge: Jeffrey J. Helmick

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Lucas County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:





Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Toldeo Personal Injury Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.




Defendant's Attorney: Brian J. Pokrywka, Katherine L. Kennedy, et al.

Description: Toledo, Ohio personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Victims Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, etc.


Plaintiff filed suit against a total of 15 churches and companies, 12 individuals, and 20 John Doe Defendants. (See Doc. No. 15). She asserts 13 causes of action:

- Count 1 - violation of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1595 (against individual Defendants and Defendant Hotels[1]);

- Count 2 - unjust enrichment (against Defendant Hotels);

- Count 3 - negligence (against Defendant Hotels);

- Count 4 - negligence (against Defendants Greater Life Christian Center and Abundant Life Ministries, Inc.);

- Count 5 - breach of fiduciary duty (against Greater Life, Abundant Life, and individual Defendants);

- Count 6 - negligence / premises liability (against Defendants Pilgrim Assets, Inc., University Bible Fellowship, and Calvary Assembly of God);

- Counts 7 and 8 - respondeat superior / vicarious liability, and negligence (against Defendants Parlux Group, LLC and Parlux Holdings, Inc.);

- Count 9 - victim of crime, Ohio Revised Code § 2307.60 (against individual Defendants);

- Count 10 - intentional infliction of emotional distress (against all Defendants);

- Count 11 - corrupt activities, Ohio Revised Code § 2923.31 (against all Defendants);

- Count 12 - claim for punitive damages (against all Defendants);

- Count 13 - declaratory judgment regarding Ohio Revised Code §§ 2315.18 and 2315.21. (Doc. No. 15 at 61-87).

Defendant Calvary Assembly of God has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Plaintiff's claims against it. Plaintiff filed a brief in opposition to Calvary's motion. Calvary filed a brief in reply.

Outcome: 07/05/2022 104 Memorandum Opinion and Order: I conclude Plaintiff fails to state a plausible claim for relief against Defendant Defendant Calvary Assembly of God and grant Calvary's motion for judgment on the pleadings. re 72 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 7/5/22. (M,SM) (Entered: 07/05/2022)
07/05/2022 105 Judgment Entry: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously, I grant the motion of Defendant Calvary Assembly of God for judgment on the pleadings. re 104 , 72 . Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 7/5/22. (M,SM) (Entered: 07/05/2022)
07/05/2022 Copy of 4/2/21 non-document Order on Motion for extension of time to answer, 4/26/21 non-document Order on Motion for extension of time to Answer, 5/17/21 non-document Order on Motion for Extension of Time to perfect service, 77 Memorandum Opinion and Order, 78 Judgment Entry, 87 Default Entry, 11/10/21 non-document Order on Motion for extension of time to file response/reply to motion, 11/23/21 non-document Order on Motion for extension of time to file response/reply to motion, 12/14/21 non-document Order on Motion for extension of time to file response/reply to motion, 97 Stipulation & Order, 99 Stipulation & Order, 102 Stipulation & Order, 103 Stipulation & Order, 104 Memorandum Opinion and Order, and 105 Judgment Entry mailed to Laura Lloyd at 15501 San Pablo Avenue, G105 Richmond, CA 94806 on 7/5/22. Related document(s) 77 , 78 , 87 , 97 , 99 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 . (M,SM) (Entered: 07/05/2022)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: