Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 07-01-2022

Case Style:

United States of America v. Carlos Efres Villatoro

Case Number: 3:22-cr-00085

Judge: Sam A. Lindsay

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:

Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory

If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.

Description: Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with:

21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B) Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute a Schedule I and II Controlled Substance
21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B) Possession with Intent to Distribute a Schedule I Controlled Substance
21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B) Possession with Intent to Distribute a Schedule II Controlled Substance

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and CARLOS EFRES VILLATORO is hereby adjudged guilty of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B), namely, Conspiracy to Possess With Intent to Distribute Forty (40) Grams or More of a Mixture or Substance Containing a Detectible Amount of Fentanyl, a Schedule II Controlled Substance. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order.

Outcome: The defendant is ordered to remain in custody.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case