Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 07-08-2022
Case Style:
State of Idaho v. Kathryn Laura Blake
Case Number: 49219
Judge: Per Curiam
Court: Court of Appeals of Idaho on appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court (Ada County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Ada County Idaho District Prosecutor's Office
Defendant's Attorney:
Description: Boise, Idaho criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with drug possession with intent to deliver.
Kathryn Laura Blake pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver, Idaho Code § 37-2732(a). The district court imposed a unified sentence of ten years with two and one-half years determinate. Blake appeals, contending that her sentence is excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Our role is limited to determining whether reasonable minds could reach the same conclusion as the district court. State v. Biggs, 168 Idaho 112, 116, 480 P.3d 150, 154 (Ct. App. 2020).
Outcome: Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years with two and one-half years determinate for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver, affirmed.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: