Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 01-09-2024

Case Style:

Ashley Leann Norris v. Tavaris Carr and Lincoln County

Case Number: 4:21-cv-00036

Judge: Charles E Atchley, Jr.

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee (Franklin County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Winchester Civil Rights Lawyer Directory




Defendant's Attorney: Winchester, Tennessee civil rights violation defense lawyer represented the Defendants.

Description: Winchester, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42:1983 Civil Rights Act violation theory.


Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code is a crucial piece of American civil rights legislation known as the Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights. It grants citizens the right to sue state and local government officials for violating their constitutional rights and certain federal laws. Here's a breakdown of its key aspects:

Who can be sued?

State and local government officials: This includes police officers, judges, prison guards, social workers, and any other person acting under the "color of law," meaning they exercise some authority derived from the state or local government.
Private individuals: In some limited circumstances, private individuals can also be sued under Section 1983 if they acted in concert with government officials or under their direction.

What rights are protected?

Any right secured by the United States Constitution, such as:
First Amendment: Freedom of speech, religion, assembly, press, and the right to petition the government.
Fourth Amendment: Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Fifth Amendment: Due process of law and protection against self-incrimination.
Fourteenth Amendment: Equal protection under the law and due process from the state.
Certain federal laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Voting Rights Act.

What constitutes a violation?

Intentional deprivation: The official must have intentionally acted in a way that deprived the plaintiff of their protected rights.
Causal connection: The official's actions must have directly caused the injury or harm to the plaintiff.

What remedies are available?

Injunctive relief: This can prevent the official from continuing the illegal conduct or require them to take certain actions to remedy the violation.
Monetary damages: The plaintiff can be compensated for the harm they suffered, including:
Medical expenses
Lost wages
Pain and suffering
Emotional distress
Legal fees

Challenges and limitations:

Qualified immunity: In some cases, government officials may be protected from liability by qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that shields them from lawsuits for actions taken in good faith and within the scope of their authority.
Procedural hurdles: Filing a Section 1983 lawsuit can be complex and require meeting certain procedural requirements and deadlines.

Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: