Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 04-19-2022

Case Style:

David Christopher Cornelius v. Wyndham Hotel & Resorts, Inc., et al.

Case Number: 4:21-cv-00057-GKF-SH

Judge: Gregory K. Frizzell

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma ( County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Tulsa Civil Rights Lawyer Directory

Defendant's Attorney: Jennifer Ary Brown, Joseph R. Farris and Steven A. Broussard

Description: Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) violation theories.

42 U.S.C. 12101 provides, in part:

It is the purpose of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to:

(1) to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities;

(2) to provide clear, strong, consistent, enforceable standards addressing discrimination against individuals with disabilities;

(3) to ensure that the Federal Government plays a central role in enforcing the standards established in this chapter on behalf of individuals with disabilities; and

(4) to invoke the sweep of congressional authority, including the power to enforce the fourteenth amendment and to regulate commerce, in order to address the major areas of discrimination faced day-to-day by people with disabilities.

Outcome: 04/19/2022 36 ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell The parties are notified that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(d), the Court will treat the defendants Route 71 Hospitality Management, LLC's and SC Petroleum LLC's Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 23] as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56. Within ten (10) days of the entry of this order, or by April 29, 2022, the moving defendants shall present any additional evidentiary materials, legal authority, and arguments not previously provided that are pertinent to their motion. Plaintiff shall respond by May 20, 2022, and the moving defendants may reply by May 31, 2022., setting/resetting deadline(s)/hearing(s): ( Responses due by 5/20/2022, Replies due by 5/31/2022) (Re: 23 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Brief in Support ) (lah, Chambers) (Entered: 04/19/2022)
04/19/2022 37 ORDER by Judge Gregory K Frizzell Upon oral notice by plaintiff's counsel that this case has closed, administratively closing the case and directing the parties to file a joint stipulation of dismissal by 5/20/22., administratively closing the case (terminates case) (Documents Terminated: 28 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint , 23 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Brief in Support ) (lah, Chambers) (Entered: 04/19/2022)
04/19/2022 ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number 37 ) (sc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 04/20/2022)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case