Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 06-18-2024

Case Style:

Tammy Bark, et al. v. Independent School District No. 16 of Mayes County, Oklahoma

Case Number: 4:21-cv-00213

Judge: Claire V. Eagan

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Tulsa Education Civil Rights Lawyer Directory



The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the landmark legislation prohibiting discrimination in several areas including housing, employment, and education. The sections of the Act relating to education are Title IV, which authorizes the Attorney General to address certain equal protection violations based on race, color, national origin, sex, and religion in public schools and institutions of higher education; Title VI, prohibiting discrimination by recipients of federal funds on the basis of race, color, and national origin; and Title IX, permitting the United States to intervene in pending suits alleging discrimination. Additionally, the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974 prohibits, among other conduct, deliberate segregation on the basis of race, color, and national origin.



Defendant's Attorney: Adam Scott Breipohl and John Eric Priddy

Description:


Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on violation of childrens' constitutional education rights.



Outcome: 06/18/2024 86 ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan - Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 85) is granted, and plaintiffs' claims against defendant John Q. Horner are dismissed with prejudice. This is a final order terminating this case. All scheduling order and other deadlines, including the July 31, 2024 pretrial conference and the September 3, 2024 jury trial, are hereby stricken., dismissing/terminating case (terminates case) (Re: 85 Stipulation of Dismissal, 66 Minute Order,,, Setting/Resetting Scheduling Order Date(s),,,,, 57 Scheduling Order,,, Setting/Resetting Scheduling Order Date(s),,, Ruling on Motion to Accelerate/Extend/Reset Hearing(s)/Deadline(s),, ) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 06/18/2024)
06/18/2024 ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number 86 ) (srt, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/20/2024)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: