Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 06-11-2024

Case Style:

Jack Sweet, et aux. v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc., et al.

Case Number: 4:21-cv-00358

Judge: John D. Russell

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Tulsa Product Liability Lawyer Directory




Defendant's Attorney: Carla De Leon Stafford and Stephani R. Johnson for Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.


Andrew M. Bowman, Larry D. Ottaway, Peyton McMillin for Allstat Marketing Group, LLC


Tucker Hampton Tucker for Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Ltd.

Description:


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on product liability theories.



A party claiming damages under Manufacturers' Products Liability has the burden of proving each of the following:

1. Defendant manufactured/sold/leased the product;

2. Defendant was in the business of manufacturing/selling/leasing such products;

3. The product was defective and because of the defect, the product was unreasonably dangerous to a person or to the property of a person who uses, consumes, or might be reasonably expected to be affected by the product;

4. The product was defective at the time it was manufactured/sold/leased by Defendant or left its control;

5. Plaintiff was a person who used, consumed, or could have reasonably been affected by the product;

6. Plaintiff sustained personal injuries and/or damage to property directly caused by the defect in the product.

Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher