Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 01-26-2024

Case Style:

John C. Woodstock v. Public Service Company of Oklahoma, et al.

Case Number: 4:23-cv-00283

Judge: Gregory K. Frizzell

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here For The Best Tulsa Personal Injury Lawyer Directory




Defendant's Attorney: Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance defense lawyers represented the Defendants

Description: Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

A plaintiff in a personal injury case has to provide that he suffered an injury as a direct result of the Defendant or an agent or employ failing to exercise due care.

Oklahoma's comparative negligence statute includes a so-called “50-percent rule.” In Oklahoma, the ability to pursue damages under comparative negligence applies when a crash victim is 49 percent or less liable for the accident.


Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: