Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 11-29-2022

Case Style:

United States of America v. George H. Moses

Case Number: 6:19-cr-06074

Judge: Elizabeth A. Wolford

Court: United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Monroe county)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:




Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan


Click Here For The Best Buffalo Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.

Description: Rochester, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with fraud.

George H. Moses, age 53, of Rochester, New York, defrauded three nonprofit organizations; Rochester Housing Charities (RHC), which provides housing to the elderly and disabled; the North East Area Development (NEAD), which assists low-income residents in the northeast quadrant of Rochester; and Quad A for Kids, which provided after-school and extended-day learning programs at some elementary schools in the Rochester City School District.

In addition to defrauding Rochester Housing Charities and the Rochester Housing Authority, Moses was also convicted of:

• Lying to the FBI regarding his hiring of Adam McFadden as a subcontractor for RHC in 2015. McFadden, a former city councilmember, pleaded guilty to defrauding RHC with respect to the subcontract and is awaiting sentencing. Moses concealed the fact that he hired McFadden after McFadden was forced to resign as the Interim Executive Director of the RHA. 
• Defrauding the Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (DASNY). As Executive Director of the NEAD, Moses applied for a $125,000 grant for renovation of the Freedom Market, owned by Freedom Community Enterprise Inc., a subsidiary of NEAD. After receiving the grant, Moses and a co-conspirator Shirley Boone tricked DASNY into believing that NEAD paid Freedom Community $45,000 for construction work which never occurred. As a result, DASNY reimbursed NEAD $45,000 to which it was not entitled. Moses used the funds to pay wages to his family members employed by NEAD.
• Filing false tax returns for the years 2014 through 2018. He failed to report income he received from NEAD and the RHC, as well as took false deductions with respect to his wife’s cleaning business and falsely claimed childcare expenses.

The sentencing is the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the direction of Acting Special Agent-in-Charge Michael Stansbury, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Acting Special Agent-in-Charge, Jerome Winkle, and Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division, under the direction of Thomas Fattorusso, Special Agent-in-Charge.

18:1341.F FRAUDS AND SWINDLES
(2rsssss)
18:1343.F FRAUD BY WIRE, RADIO, OR TELEVISION
(3rsssss)
18:1341.F FRAUDS AND SWINDLES
(3sss)
18:1957-3300.F INTERSTATE COMMERCE
(4rsssss-5rsssss)
18:1341.F FRAUDS AND SWINDLES
(5sss-6sss)
18:666A.F CONVERTS TO OWN USE PROPERTY OF ANOTHER
(7sss)
18:1349.F ATTEMPT AND CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MAIL FRAUD
(8sss)
ETC.

Outcome: Defendant was sentenced to 79 months in prison. Sentencing held on 11/29/2022 for George Moses (1), Counts 1rsssss - 6rsssss, 10rsssss - 13rsssss, 15rsssss - 25rsssss, 26rsssss-27rsssss, 28rsssss-32rsssss. Sentenced to 78 months in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for Counts 1rsssss - 6rsssss, 10rsssss - 13rsssss, 15rsssss - 25rsssss, 60 months for Counts 26rsssss-27rsssss, and, 36 months for Counts 28rsssss-32rsssss, all to run concurrently, for a total of 78 months; 3 years Supervised Release, with conditions, for Counts 1rsssss - 27rsssss, and, 1 year Supervised Release for Counts 28rsssss-32rsssss, to run concurrently, for a total of 3 years Supervised Release. See Judgment for standard, mandatory and special conditions of Supervised Release. Fines are waived. $2800 special assessment due immediately, $100 for each count. Restitution to be made as outlined in the Judgement, joint and several with any other defendant(s), convicted in this case or any related case, who share the same victim(s) and losses as indicated. Forfeiture consistent with 450 Decision and Order regarding 394 Motion for Forfeiture of Property. Parties to submit further briefing on restitution due NEAD as discussed on the record by 12/20/2022; any response due by 1/6/2023. (Court Reporter Karen Clark.)(DPS) (Entered: 11/30/2022)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: