Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 03-24-2023
Case Style:
Case Number: 7:22-cv-03359
Judge: Vincent L. Briccetti
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Westchester County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: Cali Lynn Chandiramani, Scott Richard Green
Description: White Plains, New York employment law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Fair Labor Standards Act violation theories.
29 U.S.C. 207 provides:
(a) Employees engaged in interstate commerce; additional applicability to employees pursuant to subsequent amendatory provisions
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, no employer shall employ any of his employees who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, for a workweek longer than forty hours unless such employee receives compensation for his employment in excess of the hours above specified at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which he is employed.
(2) No employer shall employ any of his employees who in any workweek is engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or is employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, and who in such workweek is brought within the purview of this subsection by the amendments made to this chapter by the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1966—
(A) for a workweek longer than forty-four hours during the first year from the effective date of the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1966,
(B) for a workweek longer than forty-two hours during the second year from such date, or
(C) for a workweek longer than forty hours after the expiration of the second year from such date,
Outcome: 03/24/2023 45 ORDER granting 44 Motion for Settlement. Accordingly, the parties' settlement agreement is APPROVED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate the pending motion (Doc. #44) and close this case. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 3/24/2023) (ks) (Entered: 03/24/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: