Date: 05-19-2020

Case Style:

Case Number: CF-2019-221

Judge: McCurdy, Jack

Court: In the District Court in and For Canadian County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Canadian County District Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:

Call 918-582-6422 for free help finding a great criminal defense lawyer in Canadian, Oklahoma.

Description:

El Reno, OK - The State of Oklahoma charged Adrain Yaniel Carrasquillo-Vega with:


Count # 1. Count as Filed: BRG2, BURGLARY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of 21 O.S. 1435
Date of Offense: 11/09/2018
Party Name Disposition Information
CARRASQUILLO-VEGA, ADRIAN YANIEL Disposed: DEFERRED, 05/12/2020. Deferred/ Expunge Denied
Count as Disposed: BURGLARY IN THE SECOND DEGREE(BRG2)
Violation of 21 O.S. 1435 which provides:



A. Every person who breaks and enters the dwelling house of another, in which there is at the time no human being present, or any commercial building or any part of any building, room, booth, tent, railroad car or other structure or erection in which any property is kept or breaks into or forcibly opens, any coin operated or vending machine or device with intent to steal any property therein or to commit any felony, is guilty of burglary in the second degree.

B. Every person who breaks and enters any automobile, truck, trailer or vessel of another, in which any property is kept, with intent to steal any property therein or to commit any felony, is guilty of burglary in the third degree.

Count # 2. Count as Filed: OPJ, CONSPIRACY, in violation of 21 O.S. 421
Date of Offense: 11/09/2018
Party Name Disposition Information
CARRASQUILLO-VEGA, ADRIAN YANIEL Disposed: DEFERRED, 05/12/2020. Deferred/ Expunge Denied
Count as Disposed: CONSPIRACY(OPJ)
Violation of 21 O.S. 421 which provides:

A. If two or more persons conspire, either:

1. To commit any crime; or

2. Falsely and maliciously to indict another for any crime, or to procure another to be charged or arrested for any crime; or

3. Falsely to move or maintain any suit, action or proceeding; or

4. To cheat and defraud any person of any property by any means which are in themselves criminal, or by any means which, if executed, would amount to a cheat or to obtaining money or property by false pretenses; or,

5. To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to trade or commerce, or for the perversion or obstruction of justice or the due administration of the laws, they are guilty of a conspiracy.

B. Except in cases where a different punishment is prescribed by law the punishment for conspiracy shall be a misdemeanor unless the conspiracy is to commit a felony.

C. Conspiracy to commit a felony shall be a felony and is punishable by payment of a fine not exceeding Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), or by imprisonment in the State Penitentiary for a period not exceeding ten (10) years, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

Outcome: 05-11-2020 CTFREE

CRT MIN. THE STATE WAS REPRESENTED BY AUSTIN MURREY, WHO APPEARED BY CONFERENCE CALL; DEFT APPEARED IN PERSON BY VIDEO IN THE COURTROOM DUE TO THE COVID 19 EMERGENCY AND THE COURTHOUSE BEING CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC; HIS ATTY ROBERT GROSHON APPEARED BY CONFERENCE CALL; DEFT PREVIOUSLY ENTERED A PLEA ON MARCH 11, 2020; SENTENCING WAS SET SEPTEMBER 21, 2020; DEFT FILED A MOTION TO ACCELERATE SENTENCING; THE COURT GRANTED THE DEFT'S REQUEST TO ACCELERATE THE SENTENCING DATE DUE TO THE DEFT NOT BEING TRANSPORTED TO LEXINGTON FOR THE RID PROGRAM BECAUSE OF THE COVID 19 EMERGENCY; WITHOUT OBJECTION; AFTER HEARING ARGUMENT FROM DEFT'S COUNSEL AND THE STATE, THE COURT ORDERED THAT SENTENCING WAS DEFERRED FOR 5 YEARS, EXCEPT FOR THE FIRST 62 DAYS TO SERVE IN THE CANADIAN COUNTY JAIL ON BOTH COUNTS WITH CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED; DEFT WAS ORDERED TO BE SUPERVISED BY THE DA'S OFFICE AND COMPLY WITH THE RULES AND CONDITIONS OF PROBATION WHICH INCLUDED THE CHANGING OFFENDER BEHAVIOR PROGRAM WITHIN 6 MONTHS, WHICH THE DEFT AGREED TO DO AND THE COURT APPROVED; DEFT WAS ORDERED TO PAY A $200 FINE ON COUNT 2 AND $200 VCA IN BOTH COUNTS AND COSTS IN BOTH COUNTS; DEFT WAS ADVISED OF HIS APPEAL RIGHTS; A RULE 8 ORDER WAS EXECUTED; JUDGE STRUBHAR

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: